DDemonRose
Member
I hadn't noticed this anomaly before but from what I saw of the XY series battling wasn't Serena's forte so nothing of value was lost.
Atleast Eevee had a personality, even if it wasn't likable. Sylveon was just bland.
I don’t quite get when people say “battling wasn’t apart of her goal”. Battling is essential to almost everything Pokémon unless you simply keep them as pets. Serena battling would of lead to her Pokémon learning new moves so we wouldn’t have been constantly exposed to “fire fire, stone edge, fire fire and fairy wind”
Sham said:I don’t quite get when people say “battling wasn’t apart of her goal”. Battling is essential to almost everything Pokémon unless you simply keep them as pets. Serena battling would of lead to her Pokémon learning new moves so we wouldn’t have been constantly exposed to “fire fire, stone edge, fire fire and fairy wind”
I meant entertaining for us (the viewers externally) not the internal viewers. Of course there are exceptions to the rules but most of the time battling=new moves about 75 percent of the time. Plus new moves would mean new combinations which could lead to different types of performances. This would be easily achieved with training or battling. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Pancham learned no new moves, Sylveon learned one new move with Fairy Wind after winning it’s first battle and Braxien has only learned two new moves.Her goal involved prancing around on-stage doing anything to keep the audience's attention to win votes, so that's probably why some people think that battling wasn't the writers' priority with her. As for her Pokemon learning new moves, that could happen without on-screen battling as we've seen plenty of times before with other Pokemon.
Most of the SM’s cast Pokémon still learned new moves by battling, training off screen or training from another person. Like I said exceptions to the rules always exist but the main consistent thing is battling is typically a way for Pokémon to learn new moves and or evolution.I'm tempted to not quite, since SM shown a lot of non-battle agendas and training approaches. Hell some of them were far more satisfying than when they are learned during battles, which often feel like deus ex machinas.
The main problem was that XY hadn't came to that conclusion yet and kept putting Serena in these dumbed down battles for her development moments, or even worse, interrupting them with predictable Team Rocket faceoffs. I'd get if it wasn't supposed to be Serena's 'thing' but if it wasn't then couldn't they have her develop through something that fit her better and she could see through in a fuller and more entertaining way?
It felt like Serena was meant to be a quiet introspective based character with a different goal, but they still felt like they had force her to follow the formula all the time at this point and look at least superficially badass.
AznKei said:I don't blame her. Aside that her goal doesn't really require battles, XYZ is pretty Ash-centric among the series that even Clemont performance as a battler despite being a gym leader is subpar outside against Ash.
Her goal involved prancing around on-stage doing anything to keep the audience's attention to win votes, so that's probably why some people think that battling wasn't the writers' priority with her. As for her Pokemon learning new moves, that could happen without on-screen battling as we've seen plenty of times before with other Pokemon.
SerenaRulez said:But it would have been more exciting to see her Pokemon gain new attacks while battling instead of her Pokemon learning new attacks in between episodes.
Fair enough, I suppose that I'm just letting my own bias against moves in the anime get to me. I usually dislike it when an episode is practically 99% filler, but then suddenly escapes the filler label just because a main character's Pokemon learns a new move towards the end of said episode. So the idea that Serena should've battled more often just so that her Pokemon would learn more moves on-screen sounded like another one of these scenarios to me.
Truth be told I'm never big on when Pokemon get moves or boosts through battles or intense situations, it always feels like plot armour rather than something they and their trainer worked for, especially in cases like Serena who don't even battle much anyway. It's just an instant win button with permanent side effects.
I don’t quite get when people say “battling wasn’t apart of her goal”. Battling is essential to almost everything Pokémon unless you simply keep them as pets. Serena battling would of lead to her Pokémon learning new moves so we wouldn’t have been constantly exposed to “fire fire, stone edge, fire fire and fairy wind”
And let's be serious. The anime had already proven long ago that battles aren't the only ways to raise your Pokémon to be stronger and learn new moves.
Of course there are exceptions to the rules but most of the time battling=new moves about 75 percent of the time.
Jessie evolved her Pumpkaboo through trading but then she got it back after realizing she was attached to it despite almost getting a Mega Mawile.You guys...do all realize that Pancham can only evolve if the trainer has a Dark type in their party, right? And while the anime *might* have been able to stretch it with Greninja being consider part of the "party" it's still a tad stretchy. Criticizing her for not doing something it was impossible for her to do just seems downright silly...