L
Lord Nidokingu
Guest
I've pondered the sig rules for some time and I believe that they could, in theory, be more lenient...
The driving purpose of the rule is to make it so people with dialup can enjoy quicker load times and to keep sigs from being too obtrusive.
The fault lies in that I can still have an image that is well below the typical 100 Kb size often seen in sigs, be taller and wider than the (2) 200 x 200 and (1) 468 x 100 banners allowed, yet still fit very easily in the average member's sig.
With a bit-size limit, the dimensions of a picture could be as large as the total sig dimensions limit -with no extra text- and still be very easy on the eyes and loading times. (if not more so.)
Example is this 67.19 Kb image: http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/9074/rtypebannerlowdetail0zx.jpg
Any feedback?
The driving purpose of the rule is to make it so people with dialup can enjoy quicker load times and to keep sigs from being too obtrusive.
The fault lies in that I can still have an image that is well below the typical 100 Kb size often seen in sigs, be taller and wider than the (2) 200 x 200 and (1) 468 x 100 banners allowed, yet still fit very easily in the average member's sig.
With a bit-size limit, the dimensions of a picture could be as large as the total sig dimensions limit -with no extra text- and still be very easy on the eyes and loading times. (if not more so.)
Example is this 67.19 Kb image: http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/9074/rtypebannerlowdetail0zx.jpg
Any feedback?
Last edited by a moderator: