Dude, its not just the fact that its been done, its that its the same arch type AND the same type combination on the same kind: a starter. You used a really crappy example with greninja; its no way near the same. The same for Greninja would be if there was already a ninja frog water starter and they decided to make a ninja seal water starter. its the fact that its yet another starter that has the same typing AND the same motiff that gets people riled up.
Another fire/fighting wrestler starter would be just plain stupid given all their options. Nobody is saying their can't be another fire/fighting pokemon, but the triple combination of another starter, with the same type, on a theme already used is infuriating given how creative they are with other pokemon. It doesn't matter if one is more sumo wrestler style and the other is a grappler; the fact that the rumor has them both as wrestlers is just plain uncreative and you know it. Dont defend or rationalize it, man; its irritating. You're playing defense on really annoying point. You know as well as everyone else here that it would be annoying as crap if this came out to be true and you would be disappointed.
EDIT: Sorry to rant, but it really bugs me when people defend really stupid things. Its like some people go out of their way to defend something that the entire planet knows is stupid just because they want to be different and edgy.
Defend "really stupid things"? "The entire planet"? Hardly, good Bus; the whole of opinion, should it not include the topic of human suffering, is subject entirely to personal taste and predilection. Yours or otherwise... so, it was most gracious of you to apologize for said statement in advance. Everyone should be so polite!
Opinions always seem to be the end of somebody's world.
I'd say both sides have very valid reasons to think as they do in this case. There are varying degrees in how one thing can be similar to another thing, and everyone is going to have a different point in which those thing become "too similar," and it probably comes down to how specific we see their defining traits. Those who get no more specific than "wrestler" are right to say they are so similar. Doesn't make those who get more specific wrong to say sumos and heels are far enough apart.
Well stated, Seven of Arcanine. However, I feel it once again necessary, though I have must often repeat myself for those in the "anti fire and fighting starter league", to aid in dispelling the "wrestler" Emboar nomenclature, as it is fairly inaccurate and far too often thrown around to vindicate gratuitous dissatisfaction with Game Freak's creative processes. Merely three articles of association bind the poor creature to this branding, and nothing more:
1) It wears a "singlet", which "may" be used for wrestling purposes, though is used more for aesthetic in this case
2) It is of the fighting variety; which, of and in itself, is a massive category with many different styles of combat with real world application (other than wrestling)
3) It's pre evolution, Pignite, is clearly wrestler inspired, yet Emboar, who is almost exclusively bulky, has little to do with the "sumo" fighting style
Other than that which I have listed, it is a large, boar like creature, inspired by a warrior monk of Chinese literature and mythology. "Fighting type" applies to so much more than the general populace seems to openly recognize. It is plain to see why many wouldn't so easily grasp the extent of Emboar's design, so I would never bare ill will for this misunderstanding. Still, I do all in my power to make others aware of this information, for the good of the Pokémon community.
Lord EDIT of Edington: Honestly; does no one deem the superb intensity of the "tiger headed wrestler" appropriate, regardless of past fire evolutionary choices? Judge the design and concept for what they are, but "unoriginality" is groundless in consideration to quality, implementation, and possible future success. Society always claims to be moving away from judgemental superficiality and into fair acceptance, and yet so many would condemn Game Freak's actions, solely for the sake of personal taste and senseless deviation from previous coincidence or pattern. Should it prove to be outstanding in battle, will it not meet with positive reception? Of course it will, design condemned or otherwise.
Out of curiosity, is there a logical basis for this, or a definitive measure of importance? Surely, a "fire cat" could evolve into countless creatures; however, the same case could be made for ANY Pokémon; and as well all should recognize, not every design would suit the entirety of the fan base- Game Freak is no doubt painfully aware of this, and yet they press on, independent of "popular opinion". I've always respected them to an immense degree because of that, friends.