I never mentioned the CW show :c
But I would shed more light on the matter in my comment to this other poster.
I was going to reason with you but then noticed your location and I presume you are taking this personally. Either way let me try. The thing with GA is it has developed more in those 75 years than Robin Hood can ever. Because, as you said, it lacks a single owner. Every story would be different. While GA kept on developing on its base story. People at GF are Japanese, if me as a non Japanese don't know about Robin's snobbish nature in several media, even though I have watched dozens stories, then I can't expect GF to know about this. Its also possible that the designer was a westner but I don't think they will let a person from West design a starter.
Now to the part why they would choose GA over Robin Hood when GA itself is based upon the latter? Because right now super heroes are much more popular than some folklore. A company like GF would want to capitalize on that. Naruto was popular they made Greninja, simple as that. I mean think about it, would you rather drive an electric car from Tesla or a 1950's Cadillac running on diesel? Besides they are getting fresh material without looking much further into some folk characters history.
And seriously do you believe DC would sue them for this? Unless they explicitly name it GA I don't think DC would even look in this direction.
Like I said before, in the past single Pokemon were based on different ideas. But just because it is a green archer its not Robin Hood. They might have drawn ideas from it.
Just because I am British doesn't mean I cannot comprehend reason regarding something set in my country. Being from the South, I don't even have any strong connection to the legends. It's just pretty ridiculous to hold a modern superhero on a pedestal over an ancient legend.
If you don't think GF does enough research to know about some of the slightly lesser-known aspects of a design they're working on, then you're just insulting them. Just because you didn't know, doesn't mean they weren't capable of basic research.
Superheros are popular. Right. So why base a Pokemon on an archer, rather than something that is explicitly a superhero. No superhero fan is going to get into Pokemon just because there is a Pokemon that looks vaguely like Green Arrow, who isn't even in the spotlight compared to most other superheros, considering he has a lesser-known TV show, compared to several blockbuster movies about multiple other more recognisable superheroes. Also, Greninja was definitely not created because Naruto was big. Firstly, Naruto had been big for years, so why make it when it was ending? Also, preeetty sure the concept of ninjas is more of a recognisable thing than specifically Naruto, and in a region based on France (which is famous for frogs legs) they had the perfect opportunity to combine the two things. Yeah nobody talks about eating Froakie legs, but they did use the French word for frog to make Greninja's name, so...
Also, Nintendo has been getting reeaally litigious lately themselves, so I can only imagine they try to avoid being hypocritical in that regard.
Everything else I was going to say was said much better in the comment below.
Yeah... This doesn't make much sense to me honestly. GF research mythos ALL THE TIME that's what they do when designing...they don't just pick designs they already know the mythos too. So they very likely researched Robin Hood and archer legends... And I don't think it's possible to base it MORE on GA then Robin Hood... When everything GA is based on is Robin Hood... That still makes it more based on Robin Hood then GA. So if they drew ideas from Robin Hood even just a little, and green arrow, it's still drawing more from Robin Hood.
It's also just more the style of Pokémon to look at older cultural myths and legends...both the other starters have older inspirations. The Alola region itself has a traditional feel to it over a modern metropolis. I'm not denying that GA plays a part, but I don't really buy that it's the sole and primary inspiration over older lore.
Thanks .Aerodactyl., well said.
I don't think GA is that much based on Robin Hood to begin with.
WHAT. Okay. Conversation over. You're clearly the one not capable of reasonable argument. I don't know what your bias towards GA is, but holy hell. And hood vs. hat??? His name is Robin HOOD. The hat is a modern thing.