We're back to the "Primarina should be mostly/only female" nonsense?
First, they're virtual animals. There's no point in applying arbitrary human gender stereotypes to them (I know even GF has done it a few times, but that's not the majority of cases).
Second, we've had tons of "male looking" Pokémons that could be female, as well as "female looking" Pokémons that could be male. I can't see what's the big deal this time.
Third, if you don't like it, don't choose it. Simple. Or at least soft-reset 'till you get what you want.
And as a last little thing: those gender norms don't make much sense, even for humans. Get over it.
Back on-topic:
Didn't know about that reason for the 7:1 ratio, interesting. Although there isn't much point to that anymore, right? They really should just make 1:1. It's not like they haven't changed way more major things thins gen.
First, they're virtual animals. There's no point in applying arbitrary human gender stereotypes to them (I know even GF has done it a few times, but that's not the majority of cases).
Second, we've had tons of "male looking" Pokémons that could be female, as well as "female looking" Pokémons that could be male. I can't see what's the big deal this time.
Third, if you don't like it, don't choose it. Simple. Or at least soft-reset 'till you get what you want.
And as a last little thing: those gender norms don't make much sense, even for humans. Get over it.
Back on-topic:
Didn't know about that reason for the 7:1 ratio, interesting. Although there isn't much point to that anymore, right? They really should just make 1:1. It's not like they haven't changed way more major things thins gen.