If you go with an IV bred and EV'ed team against someone completely random who has no idea what those things even are would that be fair according to how you are putting it? Of course not. But do you EV train your pokemon? Do you try to IV breed your pokemon? Do you give them to most competitive moveset you can or just teach them every HM they can learn?
You have a great point- I'll give you that. But RNG Abuse (lol note the name?) is nothing more than exploiting coding for ones own personal game. It takes away any integrity whatsoever. Shiny pokemon were meant to be rare, pokemon with perfect ID's were meant to be a true ***** to get and something that would be practically impossible.
Also RNG Abuse was discovered the same exact way EVs and IVs were discovered. Debugging. Just a different kind of debugging. Nothing more, nothing less. There is no real difference between the three things. You can not say one isn't legit because it wasn't clear that it existed at first, because honestly none were and were ONLY discovered due to debugging. Also it is not as easy as it seems. For RNG'ing Event Pokemon whose natures are not set it is very difficult, I spent over 12 hours trying to RNG a perfect Hasty Deoxys from a legit wondercard.
....You're kidding me right? How the hell is something that gives you a perfect pokemon that you wouldn't have a normal chance of a cold day in hell under any other circumstance similar to something all pokemon have? Are you kidding me? EV's and IV's are completely different from RNG.
Oh, and I'm so sorry for your loss. 12 hours. >_>;
On Emerald to breed flawless shinies it takes an extreme amount of time. For someone it took over 30 hours just to breed one. On FRLG it is almost impossible for most people to RNG on.
Am I supposed to donate money to a charity or something? these poor deprived people. Unable to RNG a shiny "legit" 31 IV pokemon. The horror.
A lot of the time when it came to RNG Abuse when I tried to learn it I had no clue what I was doing, I spent probably over five hours just trying to calibrate and what not. I didn't know if I hit my frame or not when I was breeding for flawless IVs and the first pokemon I got I thought was flawless, then later found out it wasn't and had to redo everything. Some times it takes a few hours just to get ONE pokemon.
I'm so sorry for your loss? ?_? All you're doing is just whining over abusing something that was not to be exploited ever. Sorry. I don't have any sympathy :/
If you include the flawless shiny captures that is very, very impressive as they need to RNG the ID/SID of it as well, the work put into it is much more than EV Training, yet EV training does something similar.
I EV train all the time. Don't even argue that it's even similar to RNG. It's totally not. |: and isn't a secret ID meant to be secret anyways? Lol.
You just need to understand the mechanics. I went through my entire HGSS cartridge twice just to be able to find out my SID. I caught the Red Gyarados in the beginning. I might restart my Diamond Cartridge just to RNG an ID/SID combination. So imagine how much time and effort was put into those things.
Read my above statement, you're abusing coding in the game that was never meant to be discovered anyway. And if you want to restart your Diamond Cartage for ~*~*~*~*~perfect shiny happy pokemon~*~*~*~*~ then be my guest. But don't whine about it. A secret ID is (obviously!) meant to be secret, and you can't obtain it without hacking (correct me if I am wrong on this).
If I do restart my Diamond cartridge I would have just thrown away over 100 HOURS just to do what, get some shinies and flawless pokemon. If someone does that do you think that they would deserve it or not? In my opinion of course they will, there is absolutely no REASON why they shouldn't.
Yeah because you totally tossed other pokemon aside for stronger pokemon that are totally alternate colored, you like, totally deserve it? Oh wait. I'm having problems with the method - not what you're sacrificing for. This is exploitation on a coding system that wasn't even made to be discovered. Debugging? Correct me if I'm wrong but were these games meant to be debugged by a third party? Of course not.
The same can be said about IVs and EVs or the physical/special split or any of the other things that aren't explictly explained in the game.
Those things are at least defined and hinted at in the games. This isn't a game mechanic.
If I breed 1,000 eggs or 20 eggs ultimately doesn't matter. You don't get points for how much "effort" you put into raising a Pokemon. You only win a battle or you lose a battle.
I guess? The method I disagree with. It's not only lacking in integrity in the game itself but it's exploitation coding that was not made to be discovered.
First, you can't prove Game Freak's intentions.
If they didn't announce it in a guide or hint at it in a game, chances are they'd never want this to leak. It seems pretty logical so stop being so arrogant.
Second, a lot of stuff is "borderline impossible".
Getting Shiny pokemon and perfect IV's were meant to be ran into by chance - not by manipulating coding.
There's also some misconception that RNG is just as easy as hacking. It takes a lot of effort to capture an RNGed Pokemon (it can still run away or whatever, or you might screw up the seed, etc...) and they still have to train it as far as effort values, TMs/HMs/level up moves, etc... and develop a strategy and all that jazz.
Oh baaaw! I'm disagreeing with the method anyways Lol. I know what it is I'm only talking about the integrity that's lost here.
This is only taking away from the part of grinding and running up and down Solaceon Town. That's it. ANY idiot can run and up down Solaceon Town and hatch eggs. It's not complicated, it's barely "effort".
So manipulating coding that gives perfect IV's that otherwise have a little chance of being perfect (that's their design) or getting a shiny pokemon (Which by normal standards are exceedingly rare) that otherwise are a pain to get unless you chain or use the masuda method are somehow just as similar as getting them through other methods? That's a bunch of BS.