It isn't fair of them to hurt America because they were offended by some speech. That's what you would expect from 5 year olds.
Except in their minds they weren't hurting America. They were helping by going against a plan that they believe is wrong and is against their ideology. The plan was very very socialist, do you honestly believe that Fiscal Conservative Republicans think the plan was helping America?
Now if you believe this bill helped America, if you believe that following the Socialism in this bill would have helped the country then that is fine. A lot of Republicans differ, because they follow a different economic ideology.
Democrats on the other hand follow the socialist ideology in this bill, so if you think this bill should have been passed that's great. But the Republicans are not the ones in control of the House. That means the Democrats have enough votes to pass anything they want, they could have passed this bill with out a single Republican vote. But instead they let 95 Democrats run for cover.
So if you really truly believe this bill should have been passed, that it's failure hurt this country. Then why don't you look at the party that had the votes to pass this bill no matter what, and didn't.
Wow. I don't even know what to say to that. That's a pretty lame reason to give the Republicans praise for.
It's a pretty lame example to pin the fall on the stock market on Republicans alone.
Aww. Were their wittle feelins huwt?
Probably, and it cost you guys. So maybe next time Pelosi should shut up and act Bi Partisan.
I didn't realise we had that much time to decide anyway... really. How much time do (or did) we have? ._.
More than half a week. This is one of the biggest economic decisions for nearly a 100 years, and the Democrats want to try and fix it in a week? How utterly reckless and dangerous.
How did Democrats "****" us up in Iraq?
Read my statement again, I never said the Democrats ****ed us up in Iraq. I said that the Democrats "love to scream about how we rushed into Iraq with out considering all of our options, and that really ****ed us up"
I am not talking about what the Democrats did, I am talking about how from Obama to Kerry, Democrats have said over and over again how we did not explore all of our options before going into Iraq, and becuase we didn't do that, becuase we made a rushed decision, that it caused us to get into a war that was screwed up. Those are the Democrats own words.
Now you want to take that type of mentality, the "Lets Rush Rush Rush through this" which was the same type of Mentality Bush had in going into Iraq. And you want to apply it to the Economy.
Who cares about a book some lady wrote praising Obama? There are many praising McCain... really. I don't know what's so wrong about this.
* Slaps head in annoyance *
She is the MODERATOR.
Get that? Do you understand what that position means?
Obviously you don't, so let me put it this way, she is supposed to be non biased, she is supposed to provide fair questions and act in a non biased sort of way.
Because of this book, she had a economic stake in the outcome of this election. Her book is coming out on the day the next President is sworn in. Now if Barack Obama is standing on that stage, her book is relevant, if John McCain is standing on that stage, then a book on Obama is Yesterday's news.
So on one of the biggest debates in this election, in a debate in which 30% of the country says they are basing their decision. She is the Moderator.
DO YOU THINK THAT WITH A HUGE ECONOMIC STAKE IN THE OUT COME OF THIS RACE THAT SHE WON'T FAVOR THE CANDIDATE THAT COULD HELP HER?!