Okay, but why does that prohibit them from adding new elements, such as new Partner Pokémon? If it's a fundamental aspect of the Let's Go series, why wouldn't it be added to a Johto Let's Go?.
Because there are 5 starters in Gen I ( 3 main + Pikachu and Eevee) while in every other gen it's only 3 main? I mean they can add it, but I don't see it. Maybe it'd be called Let's go Lugia, Let's go Ho Oh( I can see this and Let's Go Johto than Let's Go Elekid and Togepi for example).
Of course not. I'm not saying they have to. However, they clearly prefer to. And the only time they ever don't do paired games is for the third versions, and what you're describing, no matter how much you claim it to be, is fundamentally not a third version.
They can and they did broke patterns, so everything can happen now, including making Johto game as third game to LGPE.
I can only say it so many times, Kanto was just as outdated as Hoenn was, and therefore just as much in need of an update as Hoenn was.
I don't have anything against every gen being remade once or twice( that twice if big jump happens like it did with Gen 5-6), but I have problem with every gen being upgraded like 100 times.
Kanto has been done:
Gen I (1996)
Gen II(you go to Kanto) ( 1999)
Gen III(2004)
GenIV( in HG/SS you go to Kanto) (2009)
GenVII (2018)
likely Gen VIII(if they do LG Johto and you will go to Kanto there)(2020 or 2021)
So, Kanto 6 times will be done and based on your logic: Gen X( Kanto(LG) will be outdated so it needs to be added to the list of remaking it again. Lmao.That's why many people don't like this.And to answer your question: Hoenn wasn't re-visited once by then. Kanto was visited 3 times by then.So no, Kanto didn't need any remakes until we get Gen 3( we got it), Gen 4 and Gen 5. Especially 4.Also, since Kanto last appeared in 2009. It wasn't outdated. Lol.It was more recent than Hoenn ( 2002).
But why does Let's Go need a third version when Fired Red/Leaf Grean, Heart Gold/Soul Silver, and Omega Ruby/Alpha Sapphire not need one?
Because: LGPE was more 'successful than them? And because GF was interested in continuing LGPE series.And because as I said patterns can be broken.I mean Gen 1 and 2 can be treated as one gen in gen 2 you can go to Kanto, later.So, that's also why I can see it as third game.
And if it did for some reason get a third version, don't you think it would like other third versions, and take place in the same region with the same story, just upgraded?
Patterns can be broken, and Gen 2 takes place in Gen 1 since you can visit Kanto after you beat E4.Also, third game9Let's Go Johto) can also be a sequel just without 1 more version(again patterns), or to be sequels like I said: Let's Go Ho-Oh and Let's Go Lugia.
Remaking a game once every 10-15 years is not constant. But yes, I enjoy having an old outdated game updated to modern standards and reintroduced to a modern audience. I don't see how that's a bad thing, especially when it gives us more games than we would have otherwise.
It is a bad thing because it takes away opportunities for Pokemon to go forward, it's stuck in the past. We want new content; new spin offs like PokePark, Coloseum and yet GF decides to remake same gens 100 times.I said I don't mind once or twice, but more than that is laughable.And those remakes are taking slots of new content(like LGPE took away slot that GF could easily remade DP that needed it or make new PokePark or Coloseum or new spin off)Why don't that modern audience play old games, why it must be modern version of those games? They can find them in many stores it's not like they vanished.And those modern version will never be as good as old classic ones. Imagine a movie Titanic.How would you feel if you watched a remake of Titanic( just better equipment and new actors and everything is same; plot, same lines) in the year 2004 and then year 2018 and then very like in 2028( as you said 10-15 years) then again in 2038 etc etc. So you watch same plot, settings 4-5-6 times just upgraded version. Look how stupid that sounds, why not just watch 1997 version and that's it. Or maybe one more in 2018 and that's it. No need for remake every 10 years. If you guessed it, yes that that's Gen 1/Kanto pandering.My point still stands that they shouldn't remake same gens 100 times, you can agree to disagree, but that's my opinion.Not only that they made that remake and added LG elements in it. And for me Go shouldn't mix with traditional games.
I played Let's Go Pikachu and enjoyed it just fine. It may have been far from the perfect Pokémon game, but it was still fundamentally a Pokémon game, with most of the aspects of the franchise that I enjoy.
I brought up the new engine thing because you seemed to treat the engine as the absolute determination of whether or not we should get a remake, and I was pointing out how a new engine negates that argument.
Good for you. I played one remake that Gen I needed which is FireRed and played HG which is Kanto again, those games are timeless and will always be played up to moment that I will never look for Gen 1 remake again. The only way I would look for Gen 1 remake is if and only if Gen 1 was done way differently than just a "remake". Like new Pokemon, Kanto's landscape is changed, gyms are different, routes are different, E4 is different, TR is different, Pokemon are different..Cities are different. Like it's AU of Kanto we know. Then, I'd be interested.
Well, it seems it is because Gen I and II were remade before big jump and after big jump they seem to want to make all gens in new style( 3 is done), after 3 comes 4, so why did we get Gen 1 instead of Sinnoh remakes in 2018? So, I think it's kinda obvious they want to remake all games in new style. Next is 2, 3 is done in 2014, so 4 will be after 2 and 5 after 4. Then will probably new style come out and we would get gen 1(AGAIN), Gen 2, Gen 3. I just hope Gen 1 when it's remade again in the future is AU version aka literally everything different then that would spark many interests.
I was actually just agruing this before you came in, but I would explain not getting Gen III remakes in Gen V because Game Freak was in a hurry to move on to the 3DS. Gen V came out at the very end of the DS's lifespan, and it would only be natural to want to move on to the bigger and better system. So, in order to speed things up, they skipped the remakes and left them for the next generation. The same thing could be said about Sinnoh remakes in Gen VII.
The only thing I'd say her is: BW was released in 2010 and B2W2 in 2012. They could've easily made Gen III remakes in 2011( so there wouldn't be break) as they did with LGPE ( in 2018 we would've gotten a break if LGPE wasn't made). Gen 8 will be just better graphics than LGPE that's it. It won't be big jump like 5-6 was. That will likely happen in Gen 10-11.Yes, we will see what big jump will look like.
The new style that I can think of is this one( and this style looks IMO very more "real" - "human" for Pokemon):