TheEliteEmpoleon
Well-Known Member
I had a Geometry test today, and it wasn't half as bad as I expected. The two-coumn proof was the only thing that stumped me for a while, but I'm confident that I actually got a 100, which is rare.
I had a Geometry test today, and it wasn't half as bad as I expected. The two-coumn proof was the only thing that stumped me for a while, but I'm confident that I actually got a 100, which is rare.
yes because the mark you get on a year 8 test is totally going to define your future right?
idiot
So yesterday, we had a sub in AP Chemistry, and he wrote on the board what we needed to review for the test today. The list was:
mass percentage
empirical/molecular formula
JJ Thompson
Na
Nobody knew what he meant by reviewing Na, sodium. It turned out that number 4 on the test asked what color sodium is when burned. *facepalm*
I guessed yellow, which is the right answer, my reasoning being sodium sounds like a yellow element.
Yeah, Flame Test is whole another thing for lol. Elements exhibit different colors (or in flame) because of their electron shells and something that I forget hahahahaha.
yes because the mark you get on a year 8 test is totally going to define your future right?
idiot
So that's how it happens? Our Science teacher never explained how the metals gave off their colours, but then again we were only in Year 7.
This is an extra credit question on my chemistry homework:
Would Avogadro's number change if the definition of the atomic mass unit were changed from being based on carbon-12 to being based on carbon-14?
if it were 12g of C-14, then yes
How about if it were 14 g of carbon-14? I mean, they just arbitrarily defined 1 amu to be 1/12 the mass of a carbon-12 atom, so they could've just defined 1 amu to be 1/16 the mass of an oxygen-16 atom?
so I don't just do your HW for you, try calculating what avogadro's number would be if you say took 14g of C-14... I'm sure if it is a bonus question the teacher will like to see some working out with the answer
if C-14's mass was exactly 14u for the current definition of u, then it wouldn't change it, but C-14 doesn't weigh exactly 14u...
Yeah, but the question specifically says if the atomic mass unit were changed to be 1/14 of the mass of one C-14 atom instead of 1/12 of the mass of one C-12 atom.
So it wouldn't change based on that hypothetical situation, right?
I had a Geometry test today, and it wasn't half as bad as I expected. The two-coumn proof was the only thing that stumped me for a while, but I'm confident that I actually got a 100, which is rare.