Can I just say that Vector Calculus is disgusting? Because oh my god that is the most awful thing I've ever done in math. So many people in our class feel so screwed for the final so that makes me feel a lot better since I feel the same way, but it really doesn't help that we had discussion sections cancelled time after time throughout the semester, especially on the last week of lecture. Final is on Monday though which is both good and bad. At least I finish the semester on Tuesday.
In retrospect, I find the calculus series as a whole to be a mess. Calculus III is particular frustrating because a lot of ideas (e.g. and especially the idea of integral as "area under the curve"--not useful for line/surface integrals) just don't prepare you well for that class.
But after taking a year of E&M which involves vector calculus all the time, the computations and concepts from vector calculus don't bother me. I really do not like either Stewart's or Thomas's treatment of the subject. In particular, the main point of calculus III is to be able to compute integrals in R[sup]3[/sup]. However, you need to start worrying about the type of function (i.e. vector field, parametric, or scalar function) as well as the shape and type of integral you're going (line/surface/volume).
In either case, I felt for the vector calculus half specifically, Schey's book called Div Grad Curl was a much clearer presentation on the subject; that book was specifically written for physicists going on to junior-level electromagnetism. In E&M, divergence theorem and stokes' theorem are extremely important; whereas Thomas and Stewart think of them as a passing thought--they're useful to be sure, but I'm not sure Thomas/Stewart really understand those theorems particularly well nor understand how extremely important they are in applied field theories.
Anyway, I'm rambling here, so I'll just keep it at that. :L