VoltTacklingPika
Well-Known Member
I don't like how the word "団" (dan) is inflexibly translated as "Team" in the Pokemon games.
"dan" simply means "group", so it can be translated into any synonym of the world "group" depending on the context of the name. In this respect, "Team Skull" is a silly name, because Team Skull is obviously a gang of hoodlums, not an organized group of mafia/terrorists/cultists like in prior regions. In the early games, I think the word "gang" was censored, which is why you have a name like "Team Rocket".
BUT, when you have actual hoodlums in the game, it's quite strange to have the name censored, but not the characters. Team Skull has so little in common with its "predecessor" groups (i.e., none) it shouldn't share the name. Neither should "Team Yell", either.
I don't believe the word "gang" was censored at all, if only because there was no reason to. The word on its own is inoffensive and the connotations are too broad to refer to any specific events or methodologies that the translation would want to distance itself from.
Team Rocket likely exists because "Rocket Group" sounds too formal for a crime organisation in a kid's game. Team is an inoffensive word with more positive connotations, so it softens the impact of having criminals in the game, even if it's not contextually perfect. After that, it became a trend to put "Team" in front of every evil group in the game. In Team Skull's case, it's just a matter of being consistent with terminology, and also serves as something of a misdirect. The "Team" part of Team Yell actually seems to fit well, considering it is, on the surface, a group of cheerleaders.
And oh boy, do they bring it back in an...interesting way. I’m not calling XY Ash an emotionless robot, but I’m calling XY Ash an emotionless robot. I know it’s not a very unpopular opinion these days, but to a large majority it still is. To me, watching the characters interact in that saga was like being forced to eat white bread without the butter, cream cheese, bagel seasoning, whatever. It was so boring, and so was the mentor position Ash was in. There was no tension or conflict between him and the companions, which I think is necessary to establish that dynamic. With May and Dawn, it worked, because both of them had flaws that clashed with Ash but gradually matured with time, as the result of his influence on them. Clemont and especially Serena (who I like a lot, don’t get it twisted) were written too perfect and nice most of the time that there was nothing like that with them. Nothing to resolve or change other than “thanks for inspiring me to do something!” That’s boring. It’s not fun to watch.
Ash was less of a mentor in XY and more of an inspirational figure instead. Rather than learn from his technical knowledge about Pokemon or get specific advice on how to handle them (in the way May and Dawn did), Clement and Serena were motivated by Ash's personality, outlook and actions.
In this case, there may have been a missed opportunity to add wrinkles to Ash's role model status. Conflict could have come from Clemont and Serena realising that Ash wasn't perfect and the dangers of putting someone on a pedestal, but the show seemed quite intent on keeping Ash as vanilla as possible, at least until a certain point in XYZ. But even there, where Ash's displays clear flaws in his character and thinking, it doesn't change how his friends view him at all, so it loses a lot of its potential impact.
On one hand, I do think it's nice to have a supportive and wholesome group dynamic. On the other hand, I did grow bored of the group by the halfway point and wished there was more friction between them.