Isn't that a bit sexist to say let Dawn lose to Nando, when clearly Dawn has had it rougher than Ash all season. If anyone should lose, it should be Ash because we have no idea what pokemon Nando will have.
OMG I am sorry, but I have never seen anybody been retorted to and had your opinion devalued so much, and still believe it.
1.Whether Dawn had it rougher or not, Ash will always be stronger because he has been through 4 leagues, and winning one of those leagues, beating a total of 35 gym badges(uh, some of the Kanto badges may not count but you get the point) and going for his 36th, beating 7 Frontier Brains, and been offered the title of Frontier Brain.
And Dawn? She has lost 5/9 contests.
So If thinking ash is stronger because of all that is being sexist, then by golly I am a super-sexist.
2. IT IS NOT SEXIST.
3. Nando has more of a chance to beat Dawn than to beat Ash.
4. Ash has battled (once again) 35 gym leaders and 7 frontier brains, without a single idea what his opponents pokemon would be, so "not knowing Nando's pokemon" is in no way a valid advantage over Ash.
5. Besides Ash has seen as much pokemon of Nando as Dawn has. I have no idea why you think that when Ash was watching the contests the entire time. If Ash will lose to Nando for not knowing his pokemon, then Dawn will lose to Nando for not knowing his pokemon as well.