I'm not very good at reviews because I have trouble writing long, in-depth analyses on other peoples' stories.
THIS SEEMS LIKE A GOOD PLACE TO BARGE RIGHT IN. 8D
The weird thing about a lot of the big-name fic communities (PC, Serebii, and probably BMGf—idk, I've only really glanced at threads whenever a link was thrown my way) is that folks get into this mindset that a review is a huge production in which you
have to go in-depth and point out flaws and be analytical and whatnot. However, that's not true at all! That's a
style but not the end-all, be-all of reviewing. However, it's understandable if multiple (or even most) people think that this is what reviewing is because of how prevalent that style has become.
However, the truth of the matter is you can totally be short and sweet. You can totally just point out one or two things you liked about a fic. You can totally skip the liveblogging-style of quoted reviews and the essays and what-have-you and condense your review down to just a paragraph of what you liked (or didn't). The important thing is saying
something that makes it 100% clear that you actually read what the author is saying. And believe me, even just a tiny review that says, "Wow, I really like Character A. They're so intriguing because of [personality element]! I wonder if [theory about Character A] is true" is a huge help to the author because it tells them what stuck out about their work the most and entices them to engage in conversation with their readers.
Moreover, we're having a discussion about this on the Discord, so forgive me for stealing your point, Chibi Pika, but the other thing to keep in mind is that you (general you) don't
have to be great at writing or teaching to review. It's not necessary to conflate beta reading with reviewing, and it's not obligatory to point out flaws if you don't feel confident that you can do so. A constructive review can be as simple as saying what you liked and being specific (but brief) about what that thing is and why you liked it. It's
okay to not be an expert or to post positive reviews on a fic that would be ripped apart by a more critical author or to say what you're thinking in general, even if you're not that confident in your writing skills.
I know. Some of this might sound hypocritical of me to say because I haven't reviewed on Serebii in a while. It's something that I've wanted to change for some time, especially in light of the activity in this forum in comparison with another one I hang out on (specifically, the Nuzlocke forums). There, the reviewing culture is completely different. The main philosophy of the Nuz forums—which, really, should be a philosophy of fic communities in general—is that not only should you give reviews to receive reviews, but also, it's better and healthier for a community to take an active interest in other people's fics. And I say this should be a philosophy for fic communities in general because it's kinda true. The writerbase of a forum and the reviewerbase are not two different things; they're
the same exact body. For that reason, the more people only focus on their own works, the less active reviewers become because, well, all (or at least most) of the reviewers are focused on writing instead.
Again, I know that sounds hypocritical. Lately, I've been reviewing mostly on the aforementioned forum—just short little bursts of what I liked, what I thought worked and why, maybe one or two bits of crit here and there. Reviewing's getting a lot easier for me (I used to do these giant reviews with quotes and everything, then essay-length stuff and whatnot), and I hope to bring that style over onto fics here later on this week/month to get the ball rolling. But yeah, to answer the question, I basically read everything (again, technically on the other forum, but I'm def going to start back up over here), and I try to review everything. It's just that I'm also well aware that part of the reason why I haven't really reviewed lately is because I kept getting stuck on, well, myself. Like, I felt like I had to say something profound too. But interacting on other communities and taking a hard look at what was going on here made me realize that people will effing love it if you say
anything.
Tl;dr, tho, you can totally be short and sweet about what you have to say so long as you say
something. ...that isn't just "plz rite moar" because that actually
is against the rules, lmao.
(As a note, if your style is to do an in-depth review, and if you're consistent about it and most comfortable doing that, please truck on! Your style is valid too! I just don't want people to feel intimidated/obligated to do that if that's not their bag, yanno?)