William12123
The First Poke-Civer
Leak image
What bugged me was the lapras. The image didnt show lapras's fins, but it DID show a gyarados underwater? That was strange to me.
Leak image
https://twitter.com/JynxClub/status/998926527260577794
http://boards.4chan.org/vp/thread/35623978
Has to be too good to be true, right?
Yay! I'm just excited to hear that this is fake! I want more Pokemon in Kanto.
One bit I like from this is the ability to transfer guys from Go. But it still sounds too good to be true.
I don't know if some of the incorrect stuff was purposefully wrong info as much as it was stuff getting lost in a game of telephone.
Like, I remember there being stuff about a second professor in that one XY leak, which sounds more like they were confused by Sycamore's role than deliberately put in something false.
Yeah, that sounds like a dream game really.https://twitter.com/JynxClub/status/998926527260577794
http://boards.4chan.org/vp/thread/35623978
Has to be too good to be true, right?
Hmm, that's interesting.I've always firmly believed that RGBY/GSC were one timeline (I once heard it referred to as the Glitched Timeline, due to the abundance of glitches, which the person then tried to justify in-universe due to the time travel from the Time Capsule causing this timeline to self-collapse, explaining lack of connectivity to future games), and then we all know RSE/FrLg/DPPt/HgSs/BWB2W2 are another timeline (the Prime Timeline, comprising 5 of the 7 regions), with OrAs/XY/SMUsUm being the current and final timeline, known as the Mega Timeline (due to the presence of Mega Evolution and AZ's War).
Hmm, that's interesting.
I've always believed that there are 3 different timelines because of the Link Cable technology.
Still, it's always good to see other people believe that there are 3 timelines to the Pokemon series. I think I've spent too much time watching youtubers or random posters talking about only having 2 timelines that I got annoyed by it. Maybe I should stay in this forum after all, lol.
Yeah, that sounds like a dream game really.
I would love it if that happens but I don't think you should raise your expectation that high since you're setting yourself up for disappointment.
Hmm, that's interesting.
I've always believed that there are 3 different timelines because of the Link Cable technology.
Still, it's always good to see other people believe that there are 3 timelines to the Pokemon series. I think I've spent too much time watching youtubers or random posters talking about only having 2 timelines that I got annoyed by it. Maybe I should stay in this forum after all, lol.
I guess I can understand that. I also think that another reason why these people think that there are 2 timelines is because they've started playing the GBA/DS series first. They could also have played the older gen games but missed out on the tidbits of information for it.Well, in a YouTube video that's trying to be concise and for beginners, it's easier to simplify the three into two, since FrLg/HgSs aren't as extremely different from RGBY/GSC as OrAs are to RSE, so it's easier to just coalesce those pairs with their remakes.
It's even more complicated when you realize that Colosseum and XD, and the three Ranger games are all part of the Prime Timeline, and that there's even more timelines (Pokémon Mystery Dungeon, which I've often speculated is a reality where AZ's War wiped out the majority of the human race due to the primitive human settlements and presence of humans both in the distant past and near future, the various anime such as Ash's story, Origins and Generations, and the various manga).
The Pokémon Multiverse is pretty vast, and to just condense it down into the two main timelines in the games is probably the most ideal solution.
Honestly, the one thing I'm most excited for is to see how these new games fit into the timeline. I honestly hope they're not set 100 years in the future, though.
Oh yeah, I remembered that too.Well, for now we have the multiverse, and from what Maxie and Archie implied in ORAS, each version of a Pokémon game may itself be its own world.
I'll never forget what they say after you calm Kyogre/Groudon, "Perhaps in a another world, one only a fraction of an inch removed from our own, it could have been us standing against you in battle." They're literally talking about the other respective version. Perhaps it's less about timelines, and more about worlds. Maybe it's just all separate worlds we are playing in.
I guess I can understand that. I also think that another reason why these people think that there are 2 timelines is because they've started playing the GBA/DS series first. They could also have played the older gen games but missed out on the tidbits of information for it.
I'm a bit picky when it comes to small tidbits of information.
That felt like it made a mess of things even more to be honest but I get the multiverse thing too. It's also pretty much trying to tell you that this world that you're in is yours only and that you are the main character in it.
https://twitter.com/JynxClub/status/998926527260577794
http://boards.4chan.org/vp/thread/35623978
Has to be too good to be true, right?
https://twitter.com/JoeMerrick/status/999158365426241536
A dockless-version of Nintendo Switch Bundle 2 is soon to be released in Japan. It makes you wonder why you'd not need a Dock, as if some games might not connect with the TV, and Pokemon could be one of them. If so, it also debunks the leaks of Nintendo employee saying the game looks much better in the TV than it does on console. An idea, but might be worthy to note and speculate.
I am aware how the Switch works. Does that mean 'all' games due release for the console have to have the connectivity between the handheld and TV? It is sort of Sun/Moon being on 3DS despite having the non-existent 3D overworld like XY, and unlike XY during battle scenes. Yes, going against at it would breach the core idea of it regardless.Do you know how the Switch works? It wouldn't be possible to have a game that only works in handheld mode. And regardless of that, it just wouldn't make any sense. The Switch is designed to be a hybrid handheld-console experience. To make games that can only be played in handheld mode run completely contrary to that core idea.
To answer your question, the reason they would release it without the dock is because the dock costs a significant amount of money, but is technically an optional item, as the Switch is fully functional without it. Releasing it without the dock allows people who only care about playing in handheld mode get the system for cheaper. It's not about not needing a dock, it's about not wanting a dock.
True. It's also hard to deal with the leaks that generate your inner hype for the game and at the same time trying to keep your expectations low in case in some part these leaks turn out to be fake.I really hate this part of the Pokemon cycle. One part of you say that the leaks are most likely fake, but the other part wishes them to be real.
At least one game already exists that isn’t compatible with docked mode. I’m pretty sure it was an indie game, but it is already a possibility. They won’t do that with Pokémon; too many people want to play it on their tv.Do you know how the Switch works? It wouldn't be possible to have a game that only works in handheld mode. And regardless of that, it just wouldn't make any sense. The Switch is designed to be a hybrid handheld-console experience. To make games that can only be played in handheld mode run completely contrary to that core idea.