Pardon me for saying this, but given your previous comments, I do not believe you.
-
Hi all. We have had reports of member's signatures being edited to include malicious content. You can rest assured this wasn't done by staff and we can find no indication that the forums themselves have been compromised.
However, remember to keep your passwords secure. If you use similar logins on multiple sites, people and even bots may be able to access your account.
We always recommend using unique passwords and enable two-factor authentication if possible. Make sure you are secure. -
Be sure to join the discussion on our discord at: Discord.gg/serebii
U.S. Politics: The Biggest Trade in WNBA History
- Thread starter BigLutz
- Start date
Pardon me for saying this, but given your previous comments, I do not believe you.
AuraChannelerChris
Easygoing Luxray.
Sooooo is Clinton pretty much the lesser of all evils in this disastrous campaign?
Obviously, Trump is Satan.
Obviously, Trump is Satan.
SlowPokeBroKing
Future Gym Leader
Again with the bias. You're only reading what negative things I have to say about her. I have said multiple times that I will vote for her, no questions asked, if she wins the nomination. She may be strong and she may have some good proposals and she may have experience, but that does not mean I prefer her over Bernie. She is my number two choice but for good reason.
He might be lelouch in disguise, so who knows? we don't know if he is going to make america great again at the cost of his life.
(Yes I made a disgusting, stupid and painful anime reference, but I just woke up.)
I would definitely vote for Bernie before Trump, but as I have said, numerous times, Hillary could beat him better.
He certainly embodies every one of the Seven Deadly Sins, and has either broken every Commandment or encouraged others to do so.
Thepowaofhax
Well-Known Member
I don't know man, his policies are pretty solid except for the ban on Muslim immigration instead of banning immigration from high-risk countries like Syria or Libya.
Navin
MALDREAD
His policy is no policy. He is unbelievably vague, and says contradictory things. He says whatever sounds good.
Thepowaofhax
Well-Known Member
Ah, yes. Clearly his tax policy is a lie. Clearly Bernie Sanders' tax policies won't devastate workers as well. And as stated, he could easily get Mexico to build the wall by economic coercion; we're 90% of their economy and thus withdrawing trade relations until they build it would lead to economic disaster if they decline.
-Italics in this part of post are hyperbole. We're still their largest trade partner at 48%. However, this would devastate their economy and negatively affect US businesses that had moved their HQ to Mexico/similar cases.
And besides, while it may cost money to deport the illegals, there is also the fact that Hispanics households tend to have a high amount of welfare usage, as seen here. A majority of illegals tend to come from Hispanic/Latino countries.
For his promises to negotiate trade between nations, he has the experience to do so. He is a businessmen after all. I doubt you read the policies, so w/e. The only real vague one in the original link was healthcare, and even at that, those ideas sound good on paper.
Edit: Turns out, I was right about the 90% statistic. 90% of their exports go to the US, however source is a PDF file from here.
Last edited:
ya I wouldn't want to put all my trust on the economy and trade on a guy who went bankrupt like 4 or 5 times.
It'll be like having a über Christian on the space and science committee....
oh wait
Last edited:
Thepowaofhax
Well-Known Member
Chapter 11 bankruptcies; he hasn't lost any of his companies due to liquidation. And it's not like other business owners had have Chapter 11's as well.
Besides, none of the other politicians have economic experience from what I'm aware of. (Maybe Kasich does.)
Edit: Also, to point out, 3 out of 4 were Casinos, and according to Politifact, gambling has been having problems in current years. Though they did misspell gambling as gaming.
Edit2: Changed to Politifact link. Unknowingly put previous link. Plz dun hurt meh
Last edited:
Mostly accurate, but I call ******** on the fact that her problem is that she's too honest. That's *** backwards.
Silver Soul
Well-Known Member
Michigan was run as a business and look what happened in Flint.
Thepowaofhax
Well-Known Member
It was run by people who didn't oppose NAFTA. He is against NAFTA and another bill, TPP, which would also outsource jobs.
Besides, if he truly wanted to run it like a business, he wouldn't give the lower class a tax cut all the way to 0 (for Income tax), nor would he go through with these tax cuts at all. After all, more taxes means more money for the government, and assuming he runs a government as a business, he would be opposed to cutting taxes.
Last edited:
Oh Ya that was really bad. Also another great example of that is Kansas and Louisiana.
Last edited:
Thepowaofhax
Well-Known Member
NAFTA did lead to job loss in Kansas as well, for manufacturing jobs it was 5.6%, as well as other factors. I'm not sure about Louisiana.
Kind of takes a lot to make a casino go bankrupt, seeing as the only thing they're in the business of making is money.
Powerofhax, you can dredge up statistics to defend him all you want, I refuse to support a guy who is endorsed by the Klan!
Thepowaofhax
Well-Known Member
>Endorsed by the Klan
The Grand Dragon has endorsed Hillary, so technically you don't have anyone to vote for.
Also, it's been a struggling industry. You can't deny that a struggling industry will have struggling businesses.
Yeah, that was more of a stretch, but that's why I feel her and Bernie would be a great team like Biden and Obama. She knows the system and the consequences, but Bernie has the passion and the focus.
Considering his reason for supporting Hillary is that she has a "hidden agenda" that according to him will fall in line with more right-wing policies, I think that says more about him being delusional than it does anything about Hillary. Even should she have such a hidden agenda, she'd never use it because she'd never get elected to anything again. Most Republicans loathe her, and Dems, especially the many black voters she has, would desert her if she suddenly turned right-wing and fell in line with policies the KKK wants.
Unfortunately, I can't see anything that says David Duke is just as delusional about supporting Trump in the way Trump behaves, but if you have something to prove me wrong, that'd restore a bit of my hope in humanity.
Last edited: