Yea I saw that earlier. She's a sociopath. Just pure evil. She makes me sick.
Yea I saw that earlier. She's a sociopath. Just pure evil. She makes me sick.
Twitter is for the rich, and Facebook for the poor, based on these rules.This doesn't sound good...
In regards to Twitter's new terms of service.
This could affect artists, etc.. It deals with copyright. But that aside... there's a bit that is far more concerning in my opinion.
Twitter is for the rich, and Facebook for the poor, based on these rules.
Because people can just OBTAIN licenses, permissions and **** like that without cash upfront. It's TOTALLY that easy. Ughhh
This WILL backfire.
Companies need to stop having lawyers write policies that will only benefit lawyers.
I was referring to the stereotype, being magnified here, of rich liberals using Twitter, and poor Republicans using Facebook.Nah. Facebook is just as bad imo. That being said, I agree with you on it backfiring.
Yep only the rich can do that for the most part. The average person can't and will have to do without.
Can think of two things... going from an article I read quite awhile back.
A small movie director was working on a movie and tried to get permission for a song. The artist offered him a 'deal' of $15,000 for it since it was the director's birthday. The director turned him down as he couldn't spend that much money for a song.
The other example is about the song Don't Stop Believing by Journey. The cost to use that song (and no I am not kidding) is $1 million dollars.
Thing is, they don't give a damn and don't care. It's all about the money.
Worst case scenario being SWAT teams raiding houses while pinning down people who aren't vaccinated by forcing the jab on their arms with helicopters and police sirens outside the neighborhood as If an actual homicide took place. Imagine being dragged into a FEMA camp by force for still resisting to take the shot. Not only is that unethical but a human rights violation as well. The 1st Amendment isn't about white privilege, conservatism, or Republicans when it affects EVERY American regardless of political affiliation.
I was referring to the stereotype, being magnified here, of rich liberals using Twitter, and poor Republicans using Facebook.
Furthermore, the cliches are that rich Republicans use Gab, Telegram and even shadier services, and Poor Leftists WERE using Twitter after Tumblr shot themselves in the foot, but, again and again, poor Leftists have nowhere that welcomes them because they're seen as nothing more than a risk not worth keeping around.
It's almost like that idea for decentralized social media someone pitched at a conference was what poor leftists need(No, Email isn't de-centralized) to express themselves nowadays...
Heaven forbid anyone say capitalism problematic, and host service no deal with assholes, huh?
This is why a majority of purported Democrats are just Dixie-Corporatecrats in disguise. If they were a modern version of left, they'd have regulated this to hell and back.
These are common sense and ordinary terms. What's the issue with these?This doesn't sound good...
In regards to Twitter's new terms of service.
This could affect artists, etc.. It deals with copyright. But that aside... there's a bit that is far more concerning in my opinion.
The person complaining isn't even a lawyer nor does it seem like they work in compliance.
Turns out it wasn't because of the stock market, but rather someone sued them for spreading misinformation:Fox News does a sudden 180 regarding how the COVID vaccine is important...
...to recover from this:
Lives are priceless, but they are worthless against the all powerful $1.
I read some stuffs that are linked to Twitter but I didn't actually use it. I have Facebook but I don't post anything because the vibe there is more toxic, especially when it's about politics but I'm still keeping my account because of Messenger so I can keep in touch with the contacts that I know and trust.Twitter is for the rich, and Facebook for the poor, based on these rules.
Because people can just OBTAIN licenses, permissions and **** like that without cash upfront. It's TOTALLY that easy. Ughhh
This WILL backfire.
Companies need to stop having lawyers write policies that will only benefit lawyers.
jfc these activision-blizzard stories are horrifying
I hope that since CA government is leading this lawsuit, and did their own investigation, there's actual consequences because **** is not okay.
that said, I feel the realistic trajectory is something to the effect of:Yea they are .
I hope so. They need to be held accountable for their behavior.
The flu has a bunch of variants, sure, but according to CDC estimates, only about 52% of the population got a flu shot in 2019-2020 (you might have to scroll down a bit for that number, and this assumes I'm reading the thing right). Not exactly what I'd consider a point that would, like, kill it off. And we aren't even at that number for COVID.Actually most viruses mutate and because the covid vaccine doesn't actually stop you from getting covid and instead prevents you from possibly dying and being hospitalized this still could of happened. The flu has a bunch of variants.
Not to be That person, but do y'all think Hannity's got the virus and is saying this because he's concerned it'll kill him?Fox News does a sudden 180 regarding how the COVID vaccine is important...
I figured this to be the case, but it is important to have confirmation.
Also this isn’t surprising at all
GOP is changing tune about vaccine because delta variant is spooking the stock market and, importantly, their donors.Not to be That person, but do y'all think Hannity's got the virus and is saying this because he's concerned it'll kill him?
I'm revving up the crab rave anyway.