Terrorists wouldn't care about that. That's what the Mumbai group was and that is what the Chinese group was. Al Qaida is still around. Most terrorists would care only about the dead Americans.
Yup, Al Qaida is still around...
...with most of their leaders dead, no political power. Al Qaida once had about 1,000 members, (only around forty guys involved in 9/11) and today, Al-Qaeda proper consists of 300-500 guys holed up somewhere in the mountains of Pakistan living like animals, much like the Taliban, being hunted by our drones, and universally hated.
I seem to remember citizens around the world dancing in the streets when the WTC was attacked.
And how are those nations doing compared to us? Bin Laden's attempt to cripple America failed miserably. In fact, the Twin Towers wasn't exactly the best choice of targets, if you ask me. It had symbolic value, but nothing else. If he had truly wanted to hurt America, well, to name just two targets in New York alone that he could have hit if he were smart, the Federal Reserve, and Wall Street.
You see, LDS, there's a term called "terrorists without a cause", and these days, it tends to apply to ALL terrorists. (As terrorism expert Max Abrams points out. It's remarkably common for a terrorist group's policy demands to contradict each other, or to change suddenly for no apparent reason - in particular, if the group's demands are actually met, they almost never disband, but instead switch to a new issue that may be completely unrelated. In several cases, leaders of major terrorist organizations have been unable to explain exactly what they're fighting for when directly asked. So why do people join terrorist groups, if it's not really about the cause? Apparently because they're looking to make friends. No, really.
I mean, what would happen if a country agreed to Al Qaida's terms? Then what?
One could argue that the reason these groups are so wildly self-contradictory is because the leaders recruit people using little more than cultural prejudices and peer pressure to ensure that they'll be too fanatical to bother questioning their orders or listen to an outsider. End result: a handful of men can raise an army of servants ready to do whatever they're asked simply to fit in. It's like a grand, horrifying version of high school cliques.
There's a whole lot of sociology of why terrorist groups get started, why people join them, why their goals change, and so on. It's complicated.
Add in that's its a whole lot easier to blame and kill them than it is to actually run a country and keep your citizens from throwing you out. It's easier to divert their anger outward.
Now compare this to the U.S. Armed Forces, who are well-organized, with leaders who cooperate and work together well, with solid goals and contingency plans in mind, with strategies written up and stored at the Pentagon for every possible scenario.
And what exactly would stop them in the US that couldn't stop them in China?
As someone who lived in New York City, I know that a mass knifing on New York City Transit would be stopped before it could start.
By the way, LDS, if you can name a situation where the
real North Korea has managed to pull off something even
close to the scenario in
Red Dawn in recent history, I'll donate my life savings to Orly Taitz. In a fight between a unit of NK soldiers and a Girl Scout troop, my bets are on the Girl Scouts.