Like I said, the crying scene isn't bad at all.
Okay so...What exactly is the point of this discussion?
This whole discussion started because Sham said Serena crying was stupid. I disagreed and explained why Serena crying made sense for her at that point of the story.
And then you people turned it into a discussion about "well Showcases weren't well thought out" and "Dawn's first loss was handled better". Like ???
I agree with you, the Showcases were far, far from perfect, but why are you construing this as if the original topic was about Showcases quality/writing? I NEVER TALKED ABOUT THAT. Go back and read the original argument. From the start, it was just about whether Serena crying made sense or not. Sham said it was stupid that Serena cried, I responded by saying it was not stupid and explained why I felt that way.
If you agreed with my original point from the start, then ???
I'm so done with this topic. I just wanted to explain why Serena crying after losing her first Showcase made sense, and then my post was intentionally misinterpreted as if I were saying "Showcases were so good!!" and then multiple of you started arguing against me that Showcases weren't that good. I wasn't even saying they were good????
Me: Serena crying actually made sense for her, and this is why I feel that way
Everyone else: Ok but listen, the Showcases were poorly thought out and they weren't as good as Dawn's story!!!
Me: ???
Whatever, enjoy your strawman discussion and making up fictional arguments to argue against. You excel at that.