Pokegirl Fan~
Liko>>>>>Ash
It reminded me of Mario tbhI mean, what the hell was Ash's face even.
It reminded me of Mario tbhI mean, what the hell was Ash's face even.
The same thing could be said about XY... and you'll also get very defensive people stepping on your heels.I like how people prefer to repeatedly insult SM's art style rather than pull legitimate critics on it, such as how barely anything happened for a good part of it, the feeling that the writers didn't have a clear plan for a lot of it, and the extreme lack of worldbuilding.
That's all true, but don't feel like I'm bad talking SM or anything like that, it's one of my favorite series as well, the point here isn't the quality of the series itself that I'm discussing, but the quality of the arguments used by the people who insist on shitting on the series repeatedly by using the same argument of art style rather than properly reviewing the series, and even though it also applies to XY, it's not exactly the point being made.The same thing could be said about XY... and you'll also get very defensive people stepping on your heels.
SM has a loooot of flaws, that's true, but certainly XY and SM/JN seem to be aimed to very different audience profiles. I love SM, but I recognize it's cartoonish style. slice-of-life stories and relaxed rhythm don't fit everyone's expectations (and don't have to). I want real special friendships, not one-sided crushes, when someone tries to bait me with a shipping. Despite being very nice to see, I don't care so much about competitive battles or if the camera spins along with the attacks, something XY fans may see as an heresy.
But twisting in such a way the target audience of a very long show meant to be continuous could be very upsetting for the former fans. BW, XY and SM/JN adress different expectations. If anipoke wants to continue being a kodomo and make experiments in that direction, it could be better to start fresh with new characters, not to overexploit someone who won't grow with his followers and their desires.
And adding on to this, somewhat of the reason why I ignore some of the criticisms coming from certain individuals is because most of it is bait or they genuinely don’t know what’s going on with what they’re even critiquing.I mean can you even blame SM fans for being defensive when for the majority of its run it got vitroil hatred from a particular set of fans simply because it was different. Sure many criticisms can be had but the vitroil hatred at the start was so unwarranted, its hard to believe in proper good faith arguments when you have people like Jane who criticises like a toddler crying about getting a star shaped cereals rather than moon shaped ones
And even then, proper well reasoned criticisms and discussions around SM that ive seen in this forum come from SM fans or people who majorly liked it anyway, so the notion SM fans wont criticise it is just plain inaccurate. And yes when I say well reasoned, it means people like Jane or Cricket arent even considered, nor are people who just insult it to prop up their own series that they are salty about
XY also shown the problems of the old formula pre-BW coming back to haunt them without them bothering to make any change ups to it. XY failed to be very character driven, every time a new idea or challenge was suggested, the old formula butted in and went 'nope'. All the old plot beats like Team Rocket at their worst, plot armour boosts and whatnot were almost completely deciding everything the protagonists done and I think that's why so many got frustrated when Ash wasn't even able to win. It was all automated again, without even the formalities DP attempted.At the end of the day, it’s actually nice that the anime tries to stay fresh with trying out new ideas. DP, for all of its beloved moments, was the series that suffered the most from exhaustion. Not only because it ran for 4 years, but because it was the 4th series with the same formula, and fans were complaining about that. Ever since DP ended, the anime tried to change things up.
BW was a soft reboot of Ash and the innovate plot ideas regarding Plasma sadly were hindered by the unfortunate real life events. SM was the first true deviation from the games, had a new art style and was more of a slice of life anime. JN was an anime that included all things about Pokémon, not just the newest games, and didn’t shy down from having Ash actually be succesful.
The only outlier to this wave of innovation is XY, who is basically some sort of spiritual successor to the OS-DP era with a more shonen feeling and beautiful battles. I think that’s also part of the reason why XY has/had such a big fan base. It was the series that brought back many older fans who left after DP, not only because of similarities to the “old” Ash, but because this series felt like the next logical step that DP Ash would take, both as a character and as a trainer.
I liked XY, but I’m also the first one to admit that it suffers from serious flaws that are being hidden behind the make-up that is the animation. Ash had no rival for the first 100 episodes because the Kalos trio and Sawyer started out as new trainers, which was a mistake. Additionally, besides the occasional gym battle nothing really happened for 2 years as they didn’t include Team Flare until XYZ. The evil Malamar were a cool idea that was eventually dropped, Serena had no goal for the first 50 episodes and even when she had a goal, performances were just watered down contests while Clemont/Bonnie were nice but ultimately forgettable characters. Goodra was released for no reason at all and replaced by Noivern who had no focus prior to the league, the beginning of XYZ was plagued with fillers, Alain needed to be introduced earlier to make up for the lack of rivals… there’s a lot more you could criticize.
I guess this forum in particular would benefit if people were mature enough to understand you can like something and still criticize it instead of blindly defending it like a toddler.
XY did have flaws but they shouldn’t be seen as evidence to why the formula needed to change. And frankly them having Ash going to school was stupid and they made him act the most idiotic he’s ever been thanks to SMs comedic tone and art style which is the worst decision Pokemon has ever done and ruined the anime for me.I liked XY, but I’m also the first one to admit that it suffers from serious flaws that are being hidden behind the make-up that is the animation. Ash had no rival for the first 100 episodes because the Kalos trio and Sawyer started out as new trainers, which was a mistake. Additionally, besides the occasional gym battle nothing really happened for 2 years as they didn’t include Team Flare until XYZ. The evil Malamar were a cool idea that was eventually dropped, Serena had no goal for the first 50 episodes and even when she had a goal, performances were just watered down contests while Clemont/Bonnie were nice but ultimately forgettable characters. Goodra was released for no reason at all and replaced by Noivern who had no focus prior to the league, the beginning of XYZ was plagued with fillers, Alain needed to be introduced earlier to make up for the lack of rivals… there’s a lot more you could criticize.
Bro the character development of the main cast was phenomenal and carried the show. The Pokémon, on the other hand (Ash-Greninja)XY failed to be very character driven,
Introspective is a good quality but it doesn't mean the characters have any agency. They couldn't even carry a basic filler in XY without the formula taking over, upon which they were reduced to bland reactors.Bro the character development of the main cast was phenomenal and carried the show. The Pokémon, on the other hand (Ash-Greninja)
I wouldn't say "development" per se, but more like chemistry. The XY cast had interesting interactions with each other (well, with the exception of Serena and Citron [Clemont] perhaps since they rarely spoke to each other), but that's not quite the same as development. Citron in particular essentially stopped receiving important character-driven moments after the Miare [Lumiose] Gym arc.Bro the character development of the main cast was phenomenal and carried the show. The Pokémon, on the other hand (Ash-Greninja)
The problem was that while it started promising, about half way in the interaction brainstorms stopped completely. Too much of Ash's chemistry revolved around people idolising him and him giving formal advise. Most of the Pokemon that evolved stopped being characters and those that didn't often just got flanderized into gag characters. Serena and Clemont only clicked the odd time so they just.....gave up doing anything with them after a while. Team Rocket had the same issue I mentioned with many post-OS series ten fold where the protagonists just blanked them and every faceoff was one sided but not even in a comical way anymore. I think it played into the aforementioned agency problems since almost no one had a synergy by the last half.I wouldn't say "development" per se, but more like chemistry. The XY cast had interesting interactions with each other (well, with the exception of Serena and Citron [Clemont] perhaps since they rarely spoke to each other), but that's not quite the same as development. Citron in particular essentially stopped receiving important character-driven moments after the Miare [Lumiose] Gym arc.
Oh, excuse me then. It seemed to me you were giving your critics rather than presenting examples.[...] the point here isn't the quality of the series itself that I'm discussing, but the quality of the arguments used by the people who insist on shitting on the series repeatedly by using the same argument of art style rather than properly reviewing the series [...]
It's all good, those were part of my critics too, but I didn't expand much on them since that wasn't the main point there.Oh, excuse me then. It seemed to me you were giving your critics rather than presenting examples.
Although I do understand people who turn down SM purely because of the art style, not because of that being a valid argument for dismissing a creative work, but because I would do the same if that creative work contains, let's say, victimhood language. (Everyone of us have our own likes and prejudices.) And even in the rare case I were on the mood for discussing such a work, I know I need to get familiarized with it, in order to give meaningful arguments, and recognise the fact that work isn't meant to an audience like me, but to other people with their likes and expectations.
Lillie was not fine. She was made cuter.the major problem with the SM art style was Ash and TR in it, everyone else was fine it was them who stuck out sore thumbs.