1. Welll wadda ya know. Proved me right.
2. Your all over the place and make up **** to counteract whatever argument is present.
3. The title says "most uncreative"(well wadda ya know, proving point two). Arguably he worded it wrong. But it still implies as much of a scaling of favorites as saying "least creative". And even if he meant to word it like that, as I said, he's not trying to please you. (Keep in mind this is still implying IF your logic is right. )
4. First, Good for you. YOU. Second, whether you outright say it or not wasn't the point I was making.
Umm... Mew? That was Qvalador's logic, not Minedregion's.
Sawsbuck is lazy, then. They should have given it wings, fire blazing near its hooves, some golden armour. It is just a normal stag by YOUR logic.
Now I'm thoroughly convinced your just here to harass and annoy anyone who actually wants to post their opinion off of the thread.
Now I'm thoroughly convinced you're just here to harass and annoy anyone who actually wants to post their opinion off of the thread.
A good number of the people on here are. I suppose the line between stating an opinion and attacking other people's opinion isn't as broad as I thought.
Trubbish is also uncreative to me. It's missing the extra element that most Pokémon have-- it's literally a trashbag with eyes.
A good number of the people on here are. I suppose the line between stating an opinion and attacking other people's opinion isn't as broad as I thought.
Trubbish is also uncreative to me. It's missing the extra element that most Pokémon have-- it's literally a trashbag with eyes.
A good number of the people on here are. I suppose the line between stating an opinion and attacking other people's opinion isn't as broad as I thought.
Trubbish is also uncreative to me. It's missing the extra element that most Pokémon have-- it's literally a trashbag with eyes.
There is no definition, but usually a Pokémon is more than an existing object. There's usually more to it-- even Voltorb explodes. Trubbish is just... trash. In both ways.
There is no definition, but usually a Pokémon is more than an existing object. There's usually more to it-- even Voltorb explodes. Trubbish is just... trash. In both ways.
And mr mime is just a mime, grimer is just grime, and exeggcute is eggs.
Oh, flaming, are we now? I am clearly stating that your opinion is incorrect because of flawed logic. Attacking your opinion is saying 'Lol, you suck u dumas becuz ur stupid and a jrk who dosnt kno anythin a all. Shut up losa.' What I am doing is telling you that no, <Pokèmon> is not uncreative because it is based off of <Random> and just has <Random> slapped on.
Trubbish is not thrash. It is a living creature. Do you seriously think that Trubbish is filled with daily dumped thrash?
But we don't need to be told at all. We're stating our opinions and didn't ask anyone to tell us why they're wrong.
But if people weren't allowed to nitpick like that then there would be no point to this topic. You can't just expertly rationalise everything, some people just don't like certain things for petty reasons, and that's fine.
See this is what I mean. You blank out the past arguments stated and now dont even know what I'm/you're talking about. You ignore/harass everyone that say something different than your view then circlejerk with everyone that agrees with you.1. Elaborate on it. You just stated something, but never bothered to back it up.
2. Elaborate on it. You just stated something, but never bothered to back it up.
3. Let us say there were no moderators, so someone made a "[Insert Pokemon Here] Bashing Thread." He says that someone who likes the Pokemon cannot post. Are we expected to go along with it?
4. I know that...
"I'm not flaming! I'm just telling everyone that they are wrong!"Oh, flaming, are we now? I am clearly stating that your opinion is incorrect because of flawed logic. Attacking your opinion is saying 'Lol, you suck u dumas becuz ur stupid and a jrk who dosnt kno anythin a all. Shut up losa.' What I am doing is telling you that no, <Pokèmon> is not uncreative because it is based off of <Random> and just has <Random> slapped on.