Goggled Petilil
likes maids
Dunsparce is nice and obscure.
I love it's obscurity.
I think he's cute....in a way...
Dunsparce is nice and obscure.
I love it's obscurity.
I think he's cute....in a way...
One word: Swalot. What in the world is that thing? Grimer and Muk are piles of sludge but have a "texture" to them and a certain personality...
Honestly saying, there are no bad designs in Pokémon. All of them are based on excellent concepts, which, even though are not obvious at first glance, are brilliant at hindsight.
I for one actually didn't understand Dunsparce's design, until I read an article about it just today.
Pokémon are beautiful, majestic creatures, everyone should believe in that. :')
"Uncreative" and "least creative" has a big difference, my friend...
This is why this thread sucks. It could be fun. But you and your annoying butt buddies keep putting words into the mouths of others or ignoring the main point of others' posts just to get your point across. Either that or you're just really stupid.
What's wrong with gears? Admittedly, Digimon did the gear monster concept first with Hagurumon (Who I was instantly reminded of when I saw Klink), but I like how the Klink line emphasized the modularity and duality of gears.Probably Klinklang ... i mean a couple of gears put together?
I'm sorry, what? People are making illogical, incorrect, thoughtless assumptions and theories (not everyone, mind you), and now WE'RE the stupid ones? If you have a right to post arguments, then we have a right to post counter arguments. This is a discussion thread, after all, and if no one talked about what each other had said, then it would be a state-your-opinion thread, which would be sorta stupid.
"Butt buddies"? Are you really flaming? Yes, AWM is my friend, but what I say is not to back him up, as he is perfectly capable of doing that himself. Anything that I say, in agreement or not, is my own opinion and I am perfectly entitled to it -- and I am perfectly entitled to request that you stop fringing on flaming, else I will report you.
We do not put words into people's mouths, we tell them that the logic that we see in what they have said is actually incorrect, or that we disagree, and everyone, even you, has a right to do that. You so not, however, have any right to be rude and flame us because of what you think we're doing.
We do not ignore the main points of posts, we either adress them or discuss the minor points because we have no qualms with the main point.
Now, would you please be polite, or at least cordial, like we are? Because, really, everyone who is being aggressive to you is spurned on by your rude treatment, not discouraged.
And, really, I interpret 'discussion' as debate', because you can't have a decent discussion without facts and basis. Which is what these people are trying to do -- give their opinions and say, when countered, that they mustbe right because opinion = fact.
You, however, seem to be one of the more logical people, so that statement does not apply to you. Thank you for showing that sense, at least, and try not to lose your credibility by calling people names.
Shymain, IAintObeezy, SlowPokeBroKing, would it kill you to stop jabbing at each other? It feels like every time I come to this thread, I see you people arguing like this.
You contradicted yourself several times. I normally don't argue against much. Mostly, when I come on this site and feel compelled to argue, it's when people post their opinions in an opinion-based environment as such and get treated like morons because people like you say they are wrong based on fact. There is zero factuality behind any of what has been posted in this thread, yet you and whoever else keep treating anyone who wants to post here as "wrong" or "incorrect" or whatever and it has taken all the fun out of any of it. If you and the few others that keep dogging people would just let posters say what they want, this could actually be a fun topic. And if you are going to post here, why can't you just reply to posts by stating the basis behind a Pokemon's origin or something somewhat appealing to read because no one cares that you guys think creativity is fact-based or not.
Edit: Also, that "stupid" comment wasn't directed at the whole lot of you. That was mostly for AWildMew because they did, in fact, ignore everything in my post and what they said wasn't actually even relevant to what I said.
Edit: Also, that "stupid" comment wasn't directed at the whole lot of you. That was mostly for AWildMew because they did, in fact, ignore everything in my post and what they said wasn't actually even relevant to what I said.
So, here's my thing. Those that keep arguing that "there are no uncreative designs" have missed a solid point. This is the MOST UNCREATIVE. Not specifically completely uncreative Pokemon. Just Pokemon we find less time was put into their design. That adds a scale. Quit trying to say that all Pokemon are equal in terms of design. They aren't. Some were given less attention and people can decide for themselves what designs are less thoughtful and leave it at that. Checking back every hour to argue that Voltorb rocks isn't changing anyone's opinion.
Anyway, least creative (as in, not devoid of creativity, but having what appears to me as the least amount of it, still a lot, but the least compared to the rest) for me, is, I guess, I dunno, Goldeen maybe?
What do you expect? For it to grow wings? Evolution does mean it gets bigger and more intimidating. I'm basically no different than what I was when I was a toddler. I got bigger and I'm more intimidating. Guess I'm not creative, then.Muk... It's basically Grimer that got a little bigger and slightly more intimidating.