Also, the quote about the "gay agenda" is not "decades old." It's from 1993. Another quote I used is from 2000. Why do you think I wonder if those who disagree with me can read? (Whether that comment is necessary or not, as you put it.)
The article you linked to had no date that I could locate. Do not equalize that with "you pro-homos can't read!"
Also, if it is from 1993, why would the author reference Ronald Reagan, who left presidency 4 years earlier. Why not refrence the current president (George H. W. Bush) at least alongside Reagan?
Fact is, speaking objectively, we are all born imperfect, we all have immoral desires due to our animal natures.
Fact is, it is illogical to say nature is immoral. It's like saying dying is unnatural.
Also, as I've said before, morality is a matter of opinion, not fact.
We can choose to get depressed about it, or we can just accept the reality of our imperfect natures and suppress or sublimate our immoral desires. Homosexuals may be burdened with desires straights don't have, but that doesn't mean homosexuals have to get depressed.
I like how you assume it is a burden that can be suppressed, because this manner of thinking can lead to serious emotional and psychological issues in homosexuals. Nothing in nature is perfect, but nothing is imperfect. Both of these words (perfect and imperfect) suggest that change is possible when the reality is, nature just is.
And another fact is, speaking objectively, homosexuality is a disorder. I, for one, will not put down anyone for how they are born. But what behaviors people voluntarily choose to engage in---that's fair game for criticism.
But emotions, sexual attractions and romantic desires that people have no choice of experiencing - are those fair game for criticism? Also, how is it a disorder? The term describes that the person is somehow incapable of something because of the disorder.
And before you even start to entertain "reproduction", gays can reproduce, but they have sexual attractions that don't lead to "traditional" reproduction. Also, heterosexuals choose not to have children.
Also, what type of disorder is it? Medically speaking, there are five types of disorder classifications - functional, mental, physical, genetic and emotional & behavioral disorders. Since all of these things can be affected by a homosexual orientation, we first need to classify what type of disorder it is before thinking of a "cure" for it. Take a guess at which it is, because no matter what you choose, you'll be wrong.
Some of you open-minded people might want to think about this info from the pro-homosexual Psychology Today of last year: "The best scientific surveys put the number of gays in the general population between 2 and 6 percent, with most estimates near the low end of that range---contrary to the 10 percent figure that is often reported in the popular media....[W]e know gayness is not entirely genetic....Studies suggest there is a genetic basis for homosexuality in only 50 percent of gay men. No one has yet identified a particular gay gene....There is no all-inclusive explanation for the variation in sexual orientation, at least none supported by actual evidence....[T]here are many different mechanisms, not a single one, for producing homosexuality" (Robert Kunzig, "Finding the Switch," Psychology Today, May/June 2008, pages 90 and 93).
Oh my god! No GENES that produce homosexuality? Too bad I don't beleive in a true genetic basis. Even if I did, this wouldn't concern me much.
Two logical conclusions from the above: 1) It is possible to enjoy homosexual sex even if one doesn't have homosexual genes; and 2) it is possible to enjoy heterosexual sex even if one doesn't have any heterosexual genes.
Nowhere in that passage could you even infer those conclusions, let alone infer them logically. Would you enjoy gay sex? Because I wouldn't enjoy staright sex, that's for sure.
As I said anyways, there are several theories that don't concern genes.
Contrary to homosexual propaganda, homosexuals aren't locked into homosexuality. They can change. Many have.
Propaganda? Like what the last two lines of this quote are? Homosexuals are, contrary to your beliefs, locked into homosexuality. No one can change a sexual orientation. They can repress it, they can deny it all they want, but never has there been a successful change from homsoexuality to heterosexuality.
If I recall correctly, a worker at a gay conversion center was found flirting with men at a gay bar. Yes, he tried so hard to change.
You pro-homosexual people are in the odd position of using groups (e.g., the APAs) that once considered homosexuality to be a disorder to support your view that it isn't a disorder.
How is it odd? That was then, this is now. What is hard to understand about that? You are using materials that support your opinion, and we are using current material that supports ours.
A pro-homosexual psychiatrist named Ronald Bayer has written a book titled Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis, which explains how the decision to remove homosexuality from the officially approved list of mental disorders was based on power politics and intimidation by homosexual groups NOT science. Both APAs have little credibility nowadays.
That's funny because it talks about how one activist created a shadow of doubt on a stance that homosexuality was a disease since the author coudl not explain his reasoning.
The riots were caused because homosexual protesters were not allowed to protest. Isn't that a right we have?
So I guess blacks got rights through power politics and intimidation, right?
Please. Who are we debating here, christianU2ber?