Point is Pikachu can have vast disparities within a short time frame; you’ve not refuted that. Pikachu in the past has shown a comparable lvl in vs Juan, so it isn’t unreasonable when Vs Tyson is taken as a progression from that battle.
I'm more like taking into account Pikachu's performances in Leagues and upto what extent in has fluctuated in the same League. That's more relevant here we're discussing about Pikachu's relative performances in the Hoenn League. Taking that into account there hasn't really been any astronomical fluctuation upto that point like you are suggesting; a.k.a., a fluctuation of 2 tiers between Katie/Morrison Pikachu and Tyson Pikachu. In no other case in a specific League a fluctuation of that extent has happened, difference between vs Paul Pikachu and vs Tobias Pikachu literally pales in comparison to that.
Like I already said; Tyson making that comment for Meowth would’ve been redundant since the battle had to end with Meowth 1 way or another.
Pointing this out is more redundant since Tyson made that comment about Metagross, not Meowth, despite the fact the fact that Meowth left in his arsenal and Meowth was meant to be his last Pokemon. That obviously does say something. That Tyson certainly did value his Metagross a lot and Metagross's performance could make a huge impact on the battle and decide the outcome of the battle. And Meowth was yet to enter the battle then.
You’re just arbitrarily invoking the writers here; the writers put literally zero thought into the relative disparity between first round CotD league trainers. I’ve already given an example of a first round CotD league trainer Pokémon being at least as strong as I’m claiming Vivica’s Persian to be, so there’s literally zero issue with it being that strong.
It's not really arbitrarily invoking the writers, it's more like trying to assess that at what level the writers were trying to portray the preliminary round trainers, and there are 2 instances where we get an indication of the level around what level the writers were actually trying to portray the preliminary round trainers (and no, you can't really brush them off for your convenience). How can you outright say that the writers put zero thought between the disparity between the preliminary round trainers? There's literally nothing to support this claim whatsoever. It could also be the case that the writers decided to portray the preliminary round trainers around a certain level, then the double-battle round trainers around a comparatively higher level, and then the full-battle round trainers around an even higher level. It's a generally accepted concensus that as we progresses towards the higher rounds in a League, the difficulty gradually increases.
“Astronomically” would imply that they’re complete fodder relative to Persian and they’re not that weak.
Based on portrayal, Gilbert's Hitmonlee and Jump's Electabuzz weren't really much better than D spectrum/Tier 4 level Pokemon of Ash's. Hitmonlee lost pretty much low diff to Pikachu (who would go on to job vs Katie and Morrison afterwards) and while Jump's Electabuzz was dominating Morrison's Beldum it got overwhelmed with ease after Beldum evolved into Metang. So yeah, they would be pretty much 'astronomically' weaker than Vivica's Persian if it's somehow B calibre like you're suggesting.
Sure there can exist disparities between League trainers in the same rounds but assuming that the writers were trying to imply that Vivica was way more stronger than the other 2 preliminary trainers considering the fact that in 2 (a.k.a. majority) of the cases the writers portrayed the preliminary round trainers on a certain level that's not even anywhere close to the B spectrum is more unreasonable that not.
Oh really we’re going there? Okay then what constitutes entry into a league of a given region? Right it’s beating 8 gym leaders of a given region. We know that in the anime each region has far more than 8 gym leaders (likely 1 for every type making about 17 gyms in total as of AG). What evidence do you have that the set of Hoenn gym leaders that each trainer beat to enter the league were on par? Oh right absolutely none. Vivica being well above the other 2 could just mean that she beat a stronger set of gym leaders to enter the HL than they did.
Comparing League trainers from 2 completely different Leagues in 2 completely different regions is also definitely not plausible, because it could be entirely the case that the writers decided to portray the Kalos League trainers at a significantly higher level compared to the Hoenn League trainers overall (and that's actually the case). Are the Champions of the Hoenn and Kalos Leagues, a.k.a. Tyson and Alain even comparable in terms of strength? No, so comparing Titus with Vivica is fallcious.
And like I already said above, disparities can exist but assuming that there was a massive disparity like what you're suggesting between Vivica and the other 2 preliminary trainers in the Hl is more unreasonable than not because in other 2 (a.k.a. majority) of cases the writers portrayed the preliminary trainers of certain and much weaker level. Claiming that the Persian was
that much stronger is more like a wierd assumption.
I never used the wording “same day”, but whatever. Pikachu goes through arbitrary fluctuations though I’ve always defined Pikachu’s peak as him battling with full cumulative expereince with the power fluctuations being the result of how much the writers needed to nerf Pikachu for the sake of the plot and I needed to make these assumptions because of horrendously bad writing. Pikachu was at his Peak against Juan and then against Tyson where he was only marginally stronger. It would be absurd (by my definitions) if Pikachu had a dramatic power spike from his previous Peak without any noteworthy gain in expereince (from stuff like training or battling).
Vs Juan Pikachu wasn't really better than Tyson's Metagross, I would rather put it a bit lower because Pikachu needed several factors to pull of the win against Milotic, like chip damage from Swellow, type advantage, and the Water battlefield helped Pikachu clearly more than Milotic; sure Milotic was able to create a Water Vortex due to the Water battlefield, but Pikachu's Electric attacks being augmented by Water made Pikachu way more devastating and it was ultimately due to dealing Water-augmented damage to Milotic (plummeting Milotic into the Water and using Thunder) that Pikachu managed to pull of the win. So I'm not really sure that performance was really A calibre, I'd rather say no. Taking into account peak performances in Leagues usually translate into a better performance in the League for Pikachu, Juan Pikachu < Tyson Pikachu could be possible but even that's also hard to be sure about that because vs Clair Pikachu is easily and comfortably better than any version of Johto League Pikachu. It's possible that Pikachu never really went peak mode in the League.
Nah 25% is too high. I frankly consider that “recoil” damage to be fairly trivial (about as much “recoil” damage as Scizor took against Muk) and then Swellow was pretty much dead before Hyper Beam. It’s between 10 - 20% for me and most likely around 15%.
The damage dealt by Psychic wasn't insignificant whatsoever, Swellow clearly was shown struggling with that move. And neither was trivial was the recoil damage from cracking Metagross's armor. Swellow clearly and visibly was shown in pain after taking that recoil damage, how on earth is it insignificant and even remotely comparable with Scizor vs Muk(where there was no indication of any visual damage)? It clearly doesn't make any sense. If Swellow was at 15%, then it shouldn't have been anyway able to survive visibly significant damage from Psychic + recoil whatsoever, it'd have just fainted from Psychic then. It took damage on those 2 separate occasions vs Metagross before finally being KO'd by Hyper Beam. So no, based on what was shown, it doesn't make sense for Swellow to be less than 25% health before facing Metagross.
You’ve objectively made a logical fallacy. Tyson’s statement only emphasizes Metagross’s strength; nothing more and nothing less. Like I’ve said for the umpteenth time that line is completely redundant in Meowth’s case because Meowth was Tyson’s last Pokémon.
Objectively bad reasoning here. That statement has zero bearing on Meowth’s viability.
It's not logical fallacy or bad reasoning, it's literally what makes sense based on what was depicted and the circumstances at that point of time in the battle. At that point of time he had Meowth left in his arsenal, Meowth was going to be his last Pokemon. And yet he said that "the battle would end with Metagross". Why? Because he valued Metagross as a battler/powerhouse more, he believed that Metagross's performance would leave a huge impact on the battle, how Metagross performs in that battle would have a massive bearing in dictating the eventual outcome of the battle. And this is despite the fact that he still had Meowth left in his arsenal; he still, as going by the implication of his statement believed that Metagross's performance would leave a massive impact in deciding the eventual outcome of the battle. The statement in addition, does also leave an impression that if Metagross falls in that battle (a.k.a. Ash manages to bring down Metagross), it'd be a huge moment in the battle: "battle ending with Metagross".
Tyson’s comment about Metagross means “I think my Metagross is good enough to end the battle from this position without me needing any other Pokémon”; that’s it. Nowhere in this is there any claim concerning “I think my Metagross is better than my Meowth”. It would sound very stupid for him to say the same thing before sending in Meowth since the battle by definition has to end with Meowth; get that through your thick skull.
Except if he said that, it'd be underestimating his opponent's (a.k.a. Ash's) strength, and Tyson wasn't really portrayed as that much of a powerful trainer who basically stomped through the Hoenn League, as implied in his other shown battle like vs Vivica and that double battle involving Sceptile vs Aggron, he won hard fought battles throughout the League to advance. He has no reason to sound that confident that he would have it easy against Ash with his Metagross finishing the job without his Meowth being needed. Someone like Tobias, who has been stomping his way through all the League, saying stuff like that, a.k.a. the battle would end with Darkrai/Latios without me needing any other Pokemon, makes sense. But for someone like Tyson who was implied to have won hard fought battles throughout the League, saying overconfident stuff like that doesn't make sense.
Tyson's comment makes more sense to imply that he believed that Metagross's performance would have a huge impact in deciding the outcome of the battle and Metagross being brought down would be a massive moment in the battle:---> "battle ending with Metagross". The fact that he said stuff like this despite the fact that he had Meowth left in his arsenal, does somewhat trivialize Meowth's strength comparatively to Metagross.
Objectively bad reasoning imbued with a massive confirmation bias. So basically your conclusion is that Brock, Max, May and Morrison are all a bunch of idiots for reacting to Meowth the way they did despite seeing the full capabilities of Tyson’s all-mighty Metagross first-hand; that’s definitely what the writers were trying to convey mirite mate ;-) ..... give me a break.
Assuming that Tyson has significantly better knowledge about his Pokemon compared to Brock, May, Max and Morrison isn't unreasonable. Besides, their statements could just imply that Meowth was one of Tyson major powerhouses but not necessarily his strongest but not necessarily his strongest/his strongest by a significant margin. Or maybe they were a bit overhyped due to the fact that Meowth was shown to be Tyson's signature Pokemon all the time.