Wouldn't saying runner up make more sense than top 2?
I don't know that kind of irks me more than it should, but I don't know when there's only 2 people involved, you are either the winner or runner up.
Personally I don't care, so long as he gets at least two full battles, and each of his Kalos Pokemon gets a nice win. And no on Pikachu getitng more than one win unless every other Kalos Pokemon gets a win. And no on Ash bringing back his past gen Pokemon just to screw over his current generation Pokemon.
Like how Torterra was screwed entirely in the Sinnoh League, and the only 4th gen Pokemon of Ash's to not get a win.
Imo, his desire to win Pokemon Leagues has nothing to do with his performance during them. Anyway, there was a thread like this one at the start of BW (like a dozen episodes into the saga) and I predicted that he would make it to the Top 16 and that's it. People attacked me savagely for even implying that he wouldn't place Top 4 or better, and yet I had the last laugh when he barely made Top 8. Sure, I was technically off just like everyone else, but at least I had already predicted an underwhelming performance by him. This time I think I'll predict Top 4 though. I don't think he'll regress like he did in BW, so Top 4 sounds more plausible.
The only reason why Ash did bad in the last league, was because the writers didn't care at all about Ash, and preferred to over glorify someone who shouldn't have gotten any glorification in the first place.
But that's just how I interpreted why Ash did so horribly against Cameron. .