UStrainer40137
<---MINE!!!!
Just read my sig, all Kyogres are my friends. I've always used one, always will.
I won't say that I'm attached, but I'm not going to use pokemon that I dislike. I dislike Conkeldurr, I think it's an absolute abomination and I will never use it on my team no matter how good it is. Do I like some pokemon more than others? Certainly. But at the same time, you won't find a vulpix on my team even though it's my absolute favorite pokemon. And at the same time I don't really care about natures. I don't battle against others, so unless my team feels like it isn't up to snap against the elite or something, I can't be bothered with EV training or breeding for good natures or IVs. If I do, it's mostly because I'm bored.
Gigastrike said:No...GALVANTULAAAAAAAA!!!
I also tend to look at my Pokemon's natures and mannerisms and view that as their actual personality. I imagine them as real creatures and I think about them as characters. I tend to doodle pictures of them while I'm in school and I daydream about them becoming real. I wish they were real.
Same. I like thinking of each of them as having different personalities and quirks, just like pets and people. I don't care about natures or EV training -- I catch what I catch. If a pokemon has a bad nature, so what? It makes in unique and adds an extra bit of challenge to the game.
I don't get attatched to every single pokemon I catch -- mainly just the ones that stay on my team all the time and that I've beaten the Elite Four with. People on here are griping that it's impossible and/or stupid to get attatched to pokemon since they are not real. I beg to differ, because at least with me, the same thing happens with all sorts of fictional characters -- whether they are in books, video games, TV shows, movies, etc. I hold to the opinion that any time you've stayed with something a long time, and watched it grow, you will get attatched to it in some way or another.