I'm assuming you mean unborn babies, so correct me if I'm wrong.
It depends, honestly. If she's emotionally wrecked and can't handle giving birth one bit, or her life is in danger, then she should.
No, I meant six-month-old babies who have been born. You claimed that getting an abortion is the exact same thing as kiling a baby, so aborting a rape fetus is therefore the exact same thing as killing a six-month-old baby who was born of rape. Or is one acceptable and not the other, despite them being (as you said) the exact same thing?
But the government has no right to say what a random partying rich girl can do with her own body.The government has no right to say what a women can do with her own body.
However, I would like it if there were restrictions. For example, rape victims, incest victims, babies that will die upon birth, and so on should be allowed.
But some random rich girl who just doesn't want to stop partying shouldn't be able to.
What's more important: the government butting out of women's bodies, or feeling superior to party animals?
Last edited: