Auraninja
Eh, ragazzo!
I was basically reporting what I saw from a glance from MC."Sequel to major game bears similarities to its predecessor, 7/10"
Unserious jamokes, the lot of them.
The GFinity 6/10 score is the one mixed score that I had mentioned earlier, and it's definitely an outlier.
7 out of 86 positive reviews gave the game less than a 9/10, which none of those gave less than an 8/10, which is.... fine.
On a small side tangent, but the Zelda series is an interesting one where most games look vastly different from another (take Wind Waker and Twilight Princess, which released basically on the same console with one right after the other). Prior to Tears of the Kingdom, the closest we have two games released adjacently resemble each other the most is Ocarina of TIme and Majora's Mask, due to asset reusage (and no, Oracle games do not count as two separate games here). Although with MM, Termina is a vastly different place and it turned traditional Zelda progression sort of on its head. Now enter Tears of the Kingdom, which is a sequel that takes place in the same area as Breath of the Wild. It's inevitable that there will be a lot of the same in this title since TotK was made to built off of BotW. Now people can argue back and forth of what is enough of a difference to make for a completely refreshing experience, but I'm... not going to do that and just play the game and enjoy it.
Also, if I hear another "$70 for what could have been DLC" argument, I will go into that person's house, and break all their belongings, Zelda style.