should?

[squirtleboy12]

should there be attacks with multy types?

 

[Alzi]

No there shoudn't that would just destroy pokemon.

 

[parasectdude]

There kinda are, Weather Ball and Judgement Pebble.

 

[shooting star]

No. Lets say ho-oh uses a fire/flying move against paras.

4x weakness + 4x weakness + STAB + legendary stats + 1st stage bug pokemon stats..

 

[pokeboy sarab]

No a really bad idea look there ^ for reason why.

 

[Aviano]

and besides, not many moves qualify for 2 types. The onle one I can think of is Muddy water :/

 

[Scenice]

Yeah, it wouldn't be a good idea. It's just like creating the 3 typed pokemon

 

[golden_charizard]

there is one, weather ball. it normal, fire, water and ice.

 

[Aviano]

there is one, weather ball. it normal, fire, water and ice.

And rock, actually. In a sandstorm.

 

[octoboy]

I used to think muddy water should be a water/ground move which it is in Anime style battling. However, I guess it would not be nice for a quad weakness. Although it would let swampert make up for its quad weakness to sceptile...

 

[Alex]

No. Because then it would make some pokemon too powerful.

 

[Ekul the Sarcastic]

I can think of Blaze Kick and the Elemental Punches, on top of Muddy Water.

No way, though.

 

[TyZeaRlZ]

I agree. Pokemon is good the way it is and a 4x weakness would make some pokemon competively pointless.

 

[Ugobama]

Yes there should.

 

[Larzix]

Yeaaaaah, No. That would just be too much.

 

[squirtleboy12]

Yes there should.

can you explain why?plz

 

[espeon_155]

It, would be super hard, and goodness Tri attack is normal!

 

[Dimentio]

No, just no. Too much programming plus an odd occasion where the types negate their effects, plus STAB, plus dual types, plus <insert something else here>. No.

~fuzzy out~

 

[Takuya]

Like everybody else said , it would make pokemon, not pokemon anymore.

 

[Pikachu1125]

No, it's not like the trading card game.