• Hey all, due to some issues with false DMCA takedown requests, we've had to remove and censor a few things until the situation is resolved. Sorry for any inconvenience.
  • Be sure to join the discussion on our discord at: Discord.gg/serebii
  • If you're still waiting for the e-mail, be sure to check your junk/spam e-mail folders

Terror Attacks

There is two ways to stopped this, back off and let them slowly learn on their own, or kill them all with mercy. Many innocents could die if by there hand if the first option is used...
Oh my God...I think a part of my brain actually died while reading your post.

You think we should just 'nuke the fuc*ers' because if we don't, many innocents could die? May I ask, what is your miraculous method of 'killing them all with mercy' that eliminates all the terrorists but spares the live of every innocent caught up in the gunfire?

Or does it not matter, because all Arabs are terrorists at heart anyway? :rolleyes:
 
Also, the governments are too much into politics than to really help the people. I mean you, India, China, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and half the world!
Saudi Arabia? Wait, what people are you talking about?
 
Or does it not matter, because all Arabs are terrorists at heart anyway?

Nope, many are innocent. But personally, I don't care how many innocents die as long as it saves more poeple...
 
Gandhi is rolling over in his grave right now. (Yeah, I know its ironic because he was cremated.)

http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/1086.htm

^food for thought.

Love your fellow men, bra. Don't make an assumption that people are terrorists because of their religion, or that one religion promotes violence more than another. Its an ignorant thing to do, and ignorance is the root of all evil.

Their religion isn't the problem, its the way they interpret it, or more commonly, how they have been taught to interpret it by higher, non-religious powers. I understand that a lot of people here and indeed in the rest of the world have bias, and nobody is going to convince those people that they have that bias, but I hope someday they can realize it for themselves.

Terrorism is going to exist for as long as ignorance exists, and indeed longer than Christianity, Islam, or any other religion. Ignorance is going to exist for as long as people are willing to let it.

Cartman: You goddamn hippie, who let you in here?

Sorry guys, gotta go.
 
Yeah... Damn those US Troops for strapping suicide bombs onto their chests and willfully going out and targeting women and children, heading out each day and trying to rack up as many innocent deaths as possible! [/sarcasm]

I love Uninformed Children talking about Grown Up things. It's cute.

I think you meant to say: I love uniformed children talking about grown up things. It's cute.
I mean GAWD What's With The Capital Letters Man ?

Noun 1. terrorist - a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities


You're not in any position to call anyone else a child you dunce.

Nope, many are innocent. But personally, I don't care how many innocents die as long as it saves more poeple...

Edit: ROFL at this
 
Last edited:
Oh my...this HAS to be sigged. By the way the rolleyes indicated my sarcasm in that sentence.

I agree... Spread my word! >:-D

I believe, (Along with one of my idols) that all (Human) life has equal worth and who is saved doesn't matter, as long as the greatest amount is saved and that they all innocent...
 
I think you meant to say: I love uniformed children talking about grown up things. It's cute.
I mean GAWD What's With The Capital Letters Man ?

Very quick typing + Little time to care about how it looks. It gets the point across, and I have learned that if the biggest problem people have with my arguments is the punctuation or spelling, then they are just fishing for something to argue about that they believe they can win. In other words, focus less on punctuation and spelling, and on the actual argument.


Noun 1. terrorist - a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities

Funny how none of those seem to apply to US troops, since they don't A: Organize in small cells with other terrorists, or B: Use religion for a cover.

Idiots on here just rather use a very broad form of terrorism to try and attack the U.S. role in Iraq. Problem is it only works in their pathetic little mind.

You're not in any position to call anyone else a child you dunce

Dunce? Coming from you... well thanks for the laugh.
 
Last edited:
Very quick typing + Little time to care about how it looks. It gets the point across, and I have learned that if the biggest problem people have with my arguments is the punctuation or spelling, then they are just fishing for something to argue about that they believe they can win. In other words, focus less on punctuation and spelling, and on the actual argument.
Doesn't it take less keystrokes to type in lowercase? XD

Funny how none of those seem to apply to US troops, since they don't A: Organize in small cells with other terrorists, or B: Use religion for a cover.

Idiots on here just rather use a very broad form of terrorism to try and attack the U.S. role in Iraq. Problem is it only works in their pathetic little mind.
You're quick to condemn everyone that disagrees with you. I think that instead of saying 'you're wrong because your opinion differs from mine, you pathetic, pea-brained imbecile', focus on their actual argument. It gets old hearing you just whinge on about how stupid you think we are.

By the way, I noticed you didn't refute the allegation that US troops use terror as a weapon. Or was that deliberate, because only an idiot would think that?

Dunce? Coming from you... well thanks for the laugh.
Good one, mate.
 
Doesn't it take less keystrokes to type in lowercase? XD

Actually I think it is just muscle memory, I am typing so fast that I don't even focus on it.

You're quick to condemn everyone that disagrees with you. I think that instead of saying 'you're wrong because your opinion differs from mine, you pathetic, pea-brained imbecile', focus on their actual argument. It gets old hearing you just whinge on about how stupid you think we are.

The same stupid remark has been said over and over and over again that it deserves condemnation. Do you think he is the first person on here to say "US TROOPS ARE TERRORISTS" or as in the other topic: "THE US IS THE BIGGEST TERRORIST ORGANIZATION IN THE WORLD"

By the way, I noticed you didn't refute the allegation that US troops use terror as a weapon. Or was that deliberate, because only an idiot would think that?

Every war and soldier on the battlefield uses terror as a weapon, infact you could say terror is a byproduct of war no matter what. Hell a soldier just having a gun to defend himself creates terror. Difference comes in as to how that terror is administered and for what purposes is it used for, that divides the line between soldier and terrorists.
 
This is the sad state of the world today. Humanity will never move forward as a people until we can get past all the pettiness. The worst part is when the majority is blamed for the actions of the few. I know muslims can't be blamed for the actions of Al Qaueda, but I also know that our country isn't completely blameless.

I'm not one of those people who believes we can all get along, but can't we just leave each other alone to live our little lives.

Personally, I don't think we should mettle with other countries' problems since we can't even fix our own. That should be our 1st priority.
 
Nope, many are innocent. But personally, I don't care how many innocents die as long as it saves more poeple...
That'll get more people angry and spawn more radicals, namely, the friends and relatives of the dead.
I believe, (Along with one of my idols) that all (Human) life has equal worth and who is saved doesn't matter, as long as the greatest amount is saved and that they all innocent...
Indiscriminate killing is not an effective means of establishing world peace.
 
The world would be better without terrorists. But we shoukld not have a war to wipe them out. They should go to an island were all of them live and there is no way out. And no electricity. Then they would kill themselves. We would not have done bad and there would be no terorists.
 
The world would be better without terrorists. But we shoukld not have a war to wipe them out. They should go to an island were all of them live and there is no way out. And no electricity. Then they would kill themselves. We would not have done bad and there would be no terorists.

Houndom you have a wild imagination 0.o
And your solution to the whole terriost problem is dommed to fail, joking aside.

The reason why most of the terriorsts Muslim is because due to the Muslim religion, if you sacrifice your life to save the "holy land" you will go to paradiash.

That is the reason why they are so willing to die.

Terror attacks aren't always caused by Muslims. Some people of different religions sacrifice their lives for other reasons.
 
Back
Top