Animals or objects?

[Darkfire98989]

I find it rather difficult to choose, because the term "pokemon based on animals" is rather wide, if you look closely most pokemon bear some relation to an animal. I personally prefer pokemon with slight or no reference as these are more different and interestin, although some animal based ones are simply epic(GROUDON)

 

[*IZ*]

With objects theyll be more creative like rotom. With animals itll be, well just look at examples, magikarp, seel, ducklet, etc

 

[thunder_dragon2]

I like the animals more mainly but I think they need to start being more creative with them...
Being an Aussie... I WANT A KANGAROO

 

[Willow's Tara]

Pyrax- What is the Nazca Line?

Animals I prefer really. And I can see Rotom because aleast it possess the items (Note in many shows ghosts are able to control electronic devices among other things). Chandelure sure I can see that (And although one day I want to see a Fireball Pokemon, possible ghost/fire itself).

Although the garbage Pokemon? Hm I am not sure, however isn't Grimer/Muk based on sludge? I don't know which one is worse really (And I don't mind Muk). And the ice cream Pokemon, I am gonna have to agree it's weird. One thing to be an object, but a food item seriously? Maybe he will take some time for me to get used to him though.

 

[12morcego12]

Wel I like them more when based on animals. but they have gone a little to far: pidove is just a drawn pigeon with pokemon moves. and the lilipup line are just different forms of a yorkshire terriër. I have troubles with calling them pokemon. If they can't come up with anything better, then they better have to stop...

Kangaskan is based on a kangaroo...

 

[Axel]

I'm an animal lover, so I love Pokemon based off of animals.

For example, I'm a huge cat lover in real life. I always loved the feline Pokemon in the games.

 

[Moneyy]

I'm gonna be unoriginal and say animals. They just have more personality because it's easier to imagine them being alive.

This is why I will say animals. I just can't imagine ice cream Pokemon being real.

 

[Kibagos]

Animal based. and maybe some object based if they are well made.

 

[Bronzong#1]

I pick the third one: LEGENDS! OFTO

 

[kyogreblue3]

I like both as long as the designs are tasteful, and not something totally garbage like the trashbag Pokemon :/

I agree with poizonsting

 

[KittyKitty3308]

I like both but I mainly like the animal ones because you just want to keep them in real life as pets. And if pokemon were real, I would never be able to own a Vanillite. I would eat it. But I like both types. Just as long as they don't start making chair pokemon or a bottle pokemon or something that is completely off the wall, I'm ok with objects.

 

[Zoruagible]

The animals, I seem to like catching ones like Zorua and Riolu

 

[xFurret<3x]

I like the animal based pokemon best
The object ones are weird...xP

 

[Ballistic Buizel]

I like the animal based ones more than the object based ones. However, I do like SOME object based ones, such as the litwick chain.

 

[Victoria]

I prefer the animal based Pokémon! There could also be food based Pokémon, such as Celebi the onion head and Breloom the mushroom!

 

[KittyKitty3308]

I prefer the animal based Pokémon! There could also be food based Pokémon, such as Celebi the onion head and Breloom the mushroom!

And Vanillite. Just saying.

 

[King of Pichus]

I prefer object and etheral. Ghosts aren't quite animals, are they?

 

[kaiser soze]

Watch vanillite make an anime appearance that changes everyone's opinion

 

[Darkoon]

I'd prefer the animal based one, because I love animals and it's more realistic...

 

[StarlightUmbreon]

I like the animal based ones better. ^_^ ;301; ;007; ;018;