The brewers let Prince Fielder walk. Whether it was because of salary issues or not, they didn't want him
No that's missing the point entirely. Is that what you think? That the Brewers "didn't want him?" I'm baffled as to how you could arrive at that conclusion. Of course they
WANTED to keep him. He wanted more money than the Brewers could realistically offer. That's how it works. It's willful ignorance to claim they "didn't want to keep him."
Also, both those stats are incredibly relevant as it shows that they're not only unable to hit the ball well
No, batting average is maybe sixth or seventh on the list of five most relevant offensive statistics. I would put, in no particular order, OBP, SLG, WAR (or some similarly quantitative stat), OPS+ and percentage of baserunners driven in (over RBI) above batting average.
Pitcher wins are pretty relevant, as when combined with other stats
No statistic that allows a guy who gives up 5 R in 5 IP to get a win but can hand a loss to a guy who gives up 1 R over 8 IP is relevant on its own. The baseball world has, fortunately, moved way beyond taking pitcher wins to mean anything important on their own. They're a nice (or sometimes not so nice) number on the back of a baseball card these days. Nothing more. And like with your attempt to use batting average to prove a point, there are many, many more relevant pitching statistics used to evaluate a pitcher today. A general manager who even quoted wins/losses, much less used them as an evaluation metric, would be made a laughingstock of, and rightly so.
Washington has shown time and time again that they can't take advantage of a good scenario. It's happened numerous times in the playoffs over the past few seasons and even in the regular season when they wanted to shut down some of their pitchers (Strasburg) despite being in a weak division at the time.
Wait, wait, wait. Wait. You're going to downgrade Washington's grip on the division for "[showing] time and time again that they can't take advantage of a good scenario" but you're going to upgrade the chances of the hilariously inept and offensively challenged Mets on that same basis? No. That does
I'm just gonna guess that you're trolling here
No, pointing out the general irrelevance of a random, cherry picking "fact" is not trolling.